Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26573271›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2015

A comparison of Plasmodium falciparum circumsporozoite protein-based slot blot and ELISA immuno-assays for oocyst detection in mosquito homogenates.

Will Stone, Bryan Grabias, Kjerstin Lanke, Hong Zheng, Emily Locke, Diadier Diallo, Ashley Birkett, Merribeth Morin, Teun Bousema, Sanjai Kumar

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Will StoneDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. william.stone@radboudumc.nl.
Bryan GrabiasLaboratory of Emerging Pathogens, Division of Emerging and Transfusion Transmitted Diseases, Office of Blood Research and Review, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD, USA. bryan.grabias@fda.hhs.gov.
Kjerstin LankeDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. kjerstin.lanke@radboudumc.nl.
Hong ZhengLaboratory of Emerging Pathogens, Division of Emerging and Transfusion Transmitted Diseases, Office of Blood Research and Review, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD, USA. hong.zheng@fda.hhs.gov.
Emily LockePATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative, Washington DC, USA. elocke@path.org.
Diadier DialloPATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative, Washington DC, USA. ddiallo@path.org.
Ashley BirkettPATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative, Washington DC, USA. abirkett@path.org.
Merribeth MorinPATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative, Washington DC, USA. mmorin@path.org.
Teun BousemaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. teun.bousema@radboudumc.nl.
Sanjai KumarLaboratory of Emerging Pathogens, Division of Emerging and Transfusion Transmitted Diseases, Office of Blood Research and Review, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD, USA. sanjai.kumar@fda.hhs.gov.
U.S. President's Malaria Initiative · USCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NLLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe infectivity of Plasmodium gametocytes is typically determined by microscopically examining the midguts of mosquitoes that have taken a blood meal containing potentially infectious parasites. Such assessments are required for the development and evaluation of transmission-reducing interventions (TRI), but are limited by subjectivity, technical complexity and throughput. The detection of circumsporozoite protein (CSP) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and enhanced chemiluminescent slot-blot (ECL-SB) may be used as objective, scalable alternatives to microscopy for the determination of infection prevalence.

methodsTo compare the performance of the CSP ELISA and ECL-SB for the detection of mosquito infection, four groups of Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes were infected with cultured Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes. At day-8 post-infection (PI), parasite status was determined by microscopy for a sample of mosquitoes from each group. At days 8 and 10 PI, the parasite status of separate mosquito samples was analysed by both CSP ELISA and ECL-SB.

resultsWhen mosquito samples were analysed 8 days PI, the ECL-SB determined similar infection prevalence to microscopy; CSP ELISA lacked the sensitivity to detect CSP in all infected mosquitoes at this early time point. When mosquitoes were analysed 48 h later (10 days PI) both assays performed as well as microscopy for infection detection.

conclusionsWhilst microscopical examination of mosquito guts is of great value when quantification of parasite burden is required, ECL-SB and CSP ELISA are suitable alternatives at day 10 PI when infection prevalence is the desired endpoint, although CSP ELISA is not suitable at day 8 PI. These results are important to groups considering large-scale implementation of TRI.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophelesAntigens, ProtozoanEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleImmunoblottingOocystsPlasmodium falciparumProtozoan ProteinsAntigens, Protozoancircumsporozoite protein, ProtozoanProtozoan Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26573271
PMCPMC4647817
OpenAlexW2177693465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.