Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26573179›Full record

SynthesisJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2016

PON1 Q192R genetic variant and response to clopidogrel and prasugrel: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.

Jessica L Mega, Sandra L Close, Stephen D Wiviott, Michael Man, Suman Duvvuru, Joseph R Walker, Scott S Sundseth, Jean-Philippe Collet, Jessica T Delaney, Jean-Sebastien Hulot and 8 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Pharmacogenetics of Antiplatelet Therapy.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Responses to Clopidogrel: Evidences and Perspectives.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

Jessica L MegaThrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. jmega@partners.org.
Sandra L CloseDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Stephen D WiviottThrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael ManEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Suman DuvvuruEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Joseph R WalkerCelgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA.
Scott S SundsethCabernet Pharmaceuticals, Durham, NC, USA.
Jean-Philippe ColletInstitut de Cardiologie, INSERM U 937, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Jessica T DelaneyDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Jean-Sebastien HulotCardiovascular Research Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Sabina A MurphyThrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Guillaume ParéThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute, David Braley Cardiac Vascular and Stroke Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Matthew J PriceScripps Clinic and Scripps Translational Science Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Dirk SibbingI. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Tabassome SimonDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, INSERM U-698, Paris, France.
Dietmar TrenkKlinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie II, Universitaets-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Bad Krozingen, Germany.
Elliott M AntmanThrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Marc S SabatineThrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. msabatine@partners.org.
Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USEli Lilly (United States) · USInserm · FRIndiana University School of MedicineLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMcMaster University · CAScripps Clinic · USSorbonne Université · FRUniversitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen · DEVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clopidogrel and prasugrel are antiplatelet therapies commonly used to treat patients with cardiovascular disease. They are both pro-drugs requiring biotransformation into active metabolites. It has been proposed that a genetic variant Q192R (rs662 A>G) in PON1 significantly alters the biotransformation of clopidogrel and affects clinical outcomes; however, this assertion has limited support. The relationship between this variant and clinical outcomes with prasugrel has not been studied. We genotyped PON1 Q192R in 275 healthy subjects treated with clopidogrel or prasugrel and 2922 patients with an ACS undergoing PCI randomized to treatment with clopidogrel or prasugrel in the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial. A meta-analysis was performed including 13 studies and 16,760 clopidogrel-treated patients. Among clopidogrel-treated subjects, there were no associations between Q192R and active drug metabolite levels (P = 0.62) or change in platelet aggregation (P = 0.51). Consistent with these results, in clopidogrel-treated patients in TRITON-TIMI 38, there was no association between Q192R and the rates of CV death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (RR 11.2 %, QR 8.6 %, and QQ 9.3 %; P = 0.66) or stent thrombosis (RR 2.4 %, QR 0.7 %, and QQ 1.6 %, P = 0.30), with patients with the putative at-risk Q variant having numerically lower event rates. Likewise, among prasugrel-treated subjects, there were no associations between Q192R and active drug metabolite levels (P = 0.88), change in platelet aggregation (P = 0.97), or clinical outcomes (P = 0.72). In a meta-analysis, the Q variant was not significantly associated with MACE (QQ vs. RR 1.22, 95 % CI 0.84-1.76) or stent thrombosis (QQ vs. RR OR 1.36, 95 % CI 0.77-2.38). Furthermore, when restricted to the validation studies, the OR (95 % CI) for MACE and stent thrombosis were 0.99 (0.77-1.27) and 1.23 (0.74-2.03), respectively. In the present study, the Q192R genetic variant in PON1 was not associated with the pharmacologic or clinical response to clopidogrel, nor was it associated with the response to prasugrel. The meta-analysis reinforced a lack of a significant association between Q192R and cardiovascular outcomes in clopidogrel-treated patients.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeMutation, MissensePrasugrel HydrochlorideAgedAmino Acid SubstitutionAryldialkylphosphataseClopidogrelFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTiclopidineAryldialkylphosphataseClopidogrelPON1 protein, humanPrasugrel HydrochlorideTiclopidineClopidogrelGeneticsPON1Prasugrel

Identifiers

PMID26573179
OpenAlexW2211196883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.