ArticleBiopolymers2016
Structural basis for the development of SARS 3CL protease inhibitors from a peptide mimic to an aza-decaline scaffold.
Article in Biopolymers, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- PRSC chemical biology · 2023Review
- New insights into application of nanoparticles in the diagnosis and screening of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2).Emergent materials · 2021Review
- Active learning strategies with COMBINE analysis: new tricks for an old dog.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2019Article
- In vitro methods for testing antiviral drugs.Biotechnology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Design of inhibitors against severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) chymotrypsin-like protease (3CL(pro) ) is a potentially important approach to fight against SARS. We have developed several synthetic inhibitors by structure-based drug design. In this report, we reveal two crystal structures of SARS 3CL(pro) complexed with two new inhibitors based on our previous work. These structures combined with six crystal structures complexed with a series of related ligands reported by us are collectively analyzed. To these eight complexes, the structural basis for inhibitor binding was analyzed by the COMBINE method, which is a chemometrical analysis optimized for the protein-ligand complex. The analysis revealed that the first two latent variables gave a cumulative contribution ratio of r(2) = 0.971. Interestingly, scores using the second latent variables for each complex were strongly correlated with root mean square deviations (RMSDs) of side-chain heavy atoms of Met(49) from those of the intact crystal structure of SARS-3CL(pro) (r = 0.77) enlarging the S2 pocket. The substantial contribution of this side chain (∼10%) for the explanation of pIC50 s was dependent on stereochemistry and the chemical structure of the ligand adapted to the S2 pocket of the protease. Thus, starting from a substrate mimic inhibitor, a design for a central scaffold for a low molecular weight inhibitor was evaluated to develop a further potent inhibitor. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers (Pept Sci) 106: 391-403, 2016.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.