Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26572910›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2015

Predicting the relative binding affinity of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists by density functional methods.

Katarina Roos, Anders Hogner, Derek Ogg, Martin J Packer, Eva Hansson, Kenneth L Granberg, Emma Evertsson, Anneli Nordqvist

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Katarina RoosRIA Medicinal Chemistry, AstraZeneca, Pepparedsleden 1, 431 83, Mölndal, Sweden. katarina.roos@gmail.com.
Anders HognerCVMD Medicinal Chemistry, AstraZeneca, Pepparedsleden 1, 431 83, Mölndal, Sweden.
Derek OggDiscovery Sciences, AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK10 4TF, UK.
Martin J PackerOncology Medicinal Chemistry, AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK10 4TF, UK.
Eva HanssonDiscovery Sciences, AstraZeneca, Pepparedsleden 1, 431 83, Mölndal, Sweden.
Kenneth L GranbergCVMD Medicinal Chemistry, AstraZeneca, Pepparedsleden 1, 431 83, Mölndal, Sweden.
Emma EvertssonRIA Medicinal Chemistry, AstraZeneca, Pepparedsleden 1, 431 83, Mölndal, Sweden.
Anneli NordqvistCVMD Medicinal Chemistry, AstraZeneca, Pepparedsleden 1, 431 83, Mölndal, Sweden. anneli.nordqvist@astrazeneca.com.
AstraZeneca (Sweden) · SEAstraZeneca (Australia) · AUAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In drug discovery, prediction of binding affinity ahead of synthesis to aid compound prioritization is still hampered by the low throughput of the more accurate methods and the lack of general pertinence of one method that fits all systems. Here we show the applicability of a method based on density functional theory using core fragments and a protein model with only the first shell residues surrounding the core, to predict relative binding affinity of a matched series of mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonists. Antagonists of MR are used for treatment of chronic heart failure and hypertension. Marketed MR antagonists, spironolactone and eplerenone, are also believed to be highly efficacious in treatment of chronic kidney disease in diabetes patients, but is contra-indicated due to the increased risk for hyperkalemia. These findings and a significant unmet medical need among patients with chronic kidney disease continues to stimulate efforts in the discovery of new MR antagonist with maintained efficacy but low or no risk for hyperkalemia. Applied on a matched series of MR antagonists the quantum mechanical based method gave an R(2) = 0.76 for the experimental lipophilic ligand efficiency versus relative predicted binding affinity calculated with the M06-2X functional in gas phase and an R(2) = 0.64 for experimental binding affinity versus relative predicted binding affinity calculated with the M06-2X functional including an implicit solvation model. The quantum mechanical approach using core fragments was compared to free energy perturbation calculations using the full sized compound structures.

Indexed as

Crystallography, X-RayHumansHydrogen BondingMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsMolecular Docking SimulationProtein BindingQuantum TheoryReceptors, MineralocorticoidMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, MineralocorticoidDFTFEPNuclear hormone receptorQM

Identifiers

PMID26572910
OpenAlexW2174790057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.