Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26572899›Full record

Trial reportOral and maxillofacial surgery2016

Comparison of the anti-inflammatory effect of dexamethasone and ketorolac in the extractions of third molars.

Janayna Gomes Paiva-Oliveira, Paulo Roberto Haidamus Oliveira Bastos, Elenir R J Cury Pontes, Júlio César Leite da Silva, Jéssica Andréa Berto Delgado, Nelson Talatoci Oshiro-Filho

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Janayna Gomes Paiva-OliveiraProgram in Health Science and Development of the Midwest Region of the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. jgpaivaoliveira@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2090-2872
Paulo Roberto Haidamus Oliveira BastosProgram in Health Science and Development of the Midwest Region of the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Elenir R J Cury PontesProgram in Health Science and Development of the Midwest Region of the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Júlio César Leite da SilvaFaculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Jéssica Andréa Berto DelgadoFaculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Nelson Talatoci Oshiro-FilhoFaculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This double-blind, split-mouth, and randomized study was aimed to compare the efficacy of dexamethasone and ketorolac tromethamine, through the evaluation of pain, edema, and limitation of mouth opening. Thirty-four individuals aged 18-26 years, having bilateral mandibular third molars, in a similar position, were selected. Two different surgical procedures were performed on the same individual by the single surgeon. For an extraction, the individual received 1 capsule of 10 mg ketorolac tromethamine 1 h before surgery and every 8 h for 2 days. For the extraction of the contralateral side, the individual received 1 capsule of 8 mg dexamethasone 1 h before surgery and 1 placebo capsule every 8 h for 2 days. Sodium metamizol, 500 mg, was given as rescue medication in postoperative. Pain was assessed by the Visual Box Scale-11 points (BS-11) at 24 h postoperative. Edema (metric measurement) and the maximum mouth opening (interincisal) were recorded in the pre-operative, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h and 7 days postoperatively. The results showed that both therapeutic treatments used were effective in the postoperative, and there were no statistically significant differences between the groups for the pain and edema variables. However, for the limitation of mouth opening, 24 h and 7 days postoperatively, the dexamethasone group had a lower limitation of mouth opening, behaving better than the ketorolac for this variable in these periods. Due also to the higher margin of safety, the use of dexamethasone as a single dose becomes a more suitable alternative for use in routine surgical extractions of third molars.

Indexed as

Tooth ExtractionAdolescentAdultAnti-Inflammatory AgentsDexamethasoneDipyroneDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleEdemaFemaleHumansKetorolac TromethamineMaleMolar, ThirdPremedicationTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory AgentsDexamethasoneDipyroneKetorolac TromethamineAnalgesia preemptiveDexamethasoneKetorolacThird molar

Identifiers

PMID26572899
OpenAlexW2247102550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.