Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26572888›Full record

SynthesisInternational orthopaedics2016

Barbed sutures in total hip and knee arthroplasty: what is the evidence? A meta-analysis.

Robert W Borzio, Robert Pivec, Bhaveen H Kapadia, Julio J Jauregui, Aditya V Maheshwari

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International orthopaedics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Barbed versus conventional suture in elective posterior spine surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. [Surgical suture material-fundamentals].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert W BorzioDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Avenue, MSC 30, Brooklyn, NY, 11203, USA. borziorw@gmail.com.
Robert PivecDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Avenue, MSC 30, Brooklyn, NY, 11203, USA. robertpivec@yahoo.com.
Bhaveen H KapadiaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Avenue, MSC 30, Brooklyn, NY, 11203, USA. bhaveen.k@gmail.com.
Julio J JaureguiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Avenue, MSC 30, Brooklyn, NY, 11203, USA. juljau@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7878-0241
Aditya V MaheshwariDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, 450 Clarkson Avenue, MSC 30, Brooklyn, NY, 11203, USA. adityavikramm@gmail.com.
SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNewer methods of wound closure such as bidirectional barbed sutures hold the potential to reduce closure time and thus overall operating room costs during total joint arthroplasty (TJA), including total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, it is unclear whether these sutures have similar clinical outcomes or whether they place the patient at risk of developing wound complications that may outweigh the time-saving benefits of these sutures.

methodsA systematic review of the literature was performed to identify all level I trials that reported the use of barbed suture during TJA. We analyzed the efficacy, safety, major and minor complications, and overall cost related to barbed sutures.

resultsFour studies met our criteria, and included 588 patients who were randomized either to barbed suture closure (n = 290 TJAs, 268 TKAs, and 22 THAs) or to a matched conventional suture cohort (n = 298 TJAs, 279 TKAs, and 19 THA). In terms of time savings with wound closure, the barbed suture was 6.3 minutes faster than the conventional cohort (p < 0.05). The odds for developing a minor complication were nearly identical (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, p = 0.95) and for major complication was not significantly different (OR 2.94, p = 0.27). The overall mean savings including both THA and TKA was USD 298 per case.

conclusionsIn randomized controlled trials, barbed sutures are consistently associated with shorter wound closure time, which also corresponds to cost savings, even when the higher cost of these sutures is taken into account. There was no significant difference in the odds of experiencing either minor or major complications between patients in whom barbed sutures versus standard sutures were used for wound closure. Current evidence supports continued use of these sutures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

Indexed as

SuturesArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsSuture TechniquesTreatment OutcomeBarbed suturesMeta analysisTotal hip arthroplastyTotal knee arthroplastyWound closure

Identifiers

PMID26572888
OpenAlexW2243944872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.