Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26572788›Full record

Trial reportContemporary nurse2015

Nurses' perspectives on nurse-coordinated prevention programmes in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a pilot survey.

H T Jorstad, Y K Chan, W J M Scholte op Reimer, J Doornenbal, J G P Tijssen, R J G Peters

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary nurse, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

H T Jorstada Department of Cardiology , Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam , Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DE Amsterdam , The Netherlands.
Y K Chana Department of Cardiology , Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam , Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DE Amsterdam , The Netherlands.
W J M Scholte op Reimerb Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences , Nicolaes Tulphuis, Tafelbergweg 51, 1105 BD Amsterdam , The Netherlands.
J Doornenbala Department of Cardiology , Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam , Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DE Amsterdam , The Netherlands.
J G P Tijssena Department of Cardiology , Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam , Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DE Amsterdam , The Netherlands.
R J G Petersa Department of Cardiology , Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam , Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DE Amsterdam , The Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam University of Applied Sciences · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSecondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD) is increasingly provided by nurse-coordinated prevention programs (NCPP). Little is known about nurses' perspectives on these programs.

aimTo investigate nurses' perspectives/experiences in NCPPs in acute coronary syndrome patients.

methodsThirteen nurses from NCPPs in 11 medical centers in the RESPONSE trial completed an online survey containing 45 items evaluating 3 outcome categories: (1) conducting NCPP visits; (2) effects of NCPP interventions on risk profiles and (3) process of care.

resultsNurses felt confident in counseling/motivating patients to reduce CAD risk. Interventions targeting LDL, blood pressure and medication adherence were reported as successful, corresponding with significant improvements of these risk factors. Improving weight, smoking and physical activity was reported as less effective. Screening for anxiety/depression was suggested as an improvement.

conclusionsNurses acknowledge the importance and effectiveness of NCPPs, and correctly identify which components of the program are the most successful. Our study provides a basis for implementation and quality improvement for NCCPs.

Indexed as

AdultCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNursing StaffPilot Projectscardiovascular nursingcoronary artery diseaseprevention and controlrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID26572788
PMCPMC4784499
OpenAlexW2298340867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.