Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26572780›Full record

SynthesisDigestive diseases and sciences2016

A Systematic Review of Esophageal MicroRNA Markers for Diagnosis and Monitoring of Barrett's Esophagus.

Reema Mallick, Santosh K Patnaik, Sachin Wani, Ajay Bansal

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Novel Screening Alternatives for Barrett Esophagus.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. ENPP4 overexpression is associated with no recovery from Barrett's esophagus.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2020
    Article
  15. Differential MicroRNA Signatures in the Pathogenesis of Barrett's Esophagus.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Novel Screening Tests for Barrett's Esophagus.Current gastroenterology reports · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Barrett's esophagus: novel strategies for screening and surveillance.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Reema MallickDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Santosh K PatnaikDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Sachin WaniDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Ajay BansalDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Kansas City, MO, USA. abansal@kumc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1168-2476
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Kansas · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophageal epithelial microRNAs may be used to diagnose Barrett's esophagus (BE) and possibly monitor its progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC).

aimsWe reviewed studies that have investigated this to identify microRNAs with high biomarker potential for screening and disease monitoring in BE.

methodsPubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for studies that quantified esophageal epithelial microRNAs. Publications reporting microRNA comparisons of normal, non-dysplastic BE, BE with high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and EAC tissues using both unbiased discovery and independent validation phases were reviewed.

resultsEleven studies on microRNA expression differences between normal epithelium and non-dysplastic BE (seven studies), HGD (4) or EAC (7), or between non-dysplastic BE and HGD (3) or EAC (6) were identified, and the findings of their validation phase were analyzed. Increased miR-192, -194, and -215, and reduced miR-203 and -205 expression in BE compared to normal was noticed by all 4-6 of the seven studies that examined these microRNAs. In heterogeneity tests of the reported fold-change values, the I (2) statistics were 7.9-17.1 % (all P < 0.05). Elevated miR-192, -194, and -215, and diminished miR-203 and -205 levels were also noted for comparisons of HGD or EAC against normal. In contrast, a consistent microRNA expression difference was absent for the comparisons of HGD or EAC against BE.

conclusionsMicroRNAs miR-192, -194, -203, -205, and -215 are promising tissue biomarkers for diagnosing BE. Cross-sectional data suggest that microRNAs may have a limited role in separating BE from HGD/EAC epithelia but need further testing in longitudinal follow-up studies.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBarrett EsophagusBiomarkersEsophageal NeoplasmsHumansMicroRNAsBiomarkersMicroRNAsBarrett’s esophagusEsophageal adenocarcinomaGastroesophageal reflux diseaseMicroRNA

Identifiers

PMID26572780
OpenAlexW2175365136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.