Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26572742›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2015

Palliative care professionals' willingness to perform euthanasia or physician assisted suicide.

Julia Zenz, Michael Tryba, Michael Zenz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Assisted Suicide in Austria: Nurses' Understanding of Patients' Requests and the Role of Patient Symptoms.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Attitudes and opinions towards suicidality in professionals working with oncology patients: results from an online survey.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A National Survey of Canadian Psychiatrists' Attitudes toward Medical Assistance in Death.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia ZenzRuhr-University Bochum, Universitätstr. 150, D 44801, Bochum, Germany. juliazenz@mail.de.
Michael TrybaClinic for Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Moenchebergstraße 41-43, D 34125, Kassel, Germany. michael.tryba@klinikum-kassel.de.
Michael ZenzRuhr-University Bochum, Universitätstr. 150, D 44801, Bochum, Germany. zenz@anaesthesia.de.
Ruhr University Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEuthanasia and physician assisted suicide (PAS) are highly debated upon particularly in the light of medical advancement and an aging society. Little is known about the professionals' willingness to perform these practices particularly among those engaged in the field of palliative care and pain management. Thus a study was performed among those professionals.

methodsAn anonymous questionnaire was handed out to all participants of a palliative care congress and a pain symposium in 2013. The questionnaire consisted of 8 questions regarding end of life decisions. Proposed patient vignettes were used.

resultsA total of 470 eligible questionnaires were returned, 198 by physicians, 272 by nurses. The response rate was 64 %. The majority of professionals were reluctant to perform euthanasia or PAS: 5.3 % of the respondents would be willing to perform euthanasia on a patient with a terminal illness if asked to do so. The reluctance grew in case of a patient with a non-terminal illness. The respondents were more willing to perform PAS than euthanasia. Nurses were more reluctant to take action as opposed to the physicians. The majority of the respondents would attempt to treat the patient's symptoms first before considering life-ending measures. As regards any decision making process the majority would consult with a colleague.

conclusionsThis is the first German study to ask about the willingness of professionals to take action as regards euthanasia and PAS without biased phrasing. As opposed to the general acceptance that is respectively high, the actual willingness to perform life-ending measures is low. The German debate on physician assisted suicide and its possible legalization should also incorporate clarifications regarding the responsibility who should eventually perform these acts.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEuthanasiaGermanyHealth PersonnelHumansPalliative CareQuality of LifeSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26572742
PMCPMC4647811
OpenAlexW2172987278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.