Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26572653›Full record

ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2015

16p11.2 Deletion mice display cognitive deficits in touchscreen learning and novelty recognition tasks.

Mu Yang, Freeman C Lewis, Michael S Sarvi, Gillian M Foley, Jacqueline N Crawley

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Critical periods and Autism Spectrum Disorders, a role for sleep.Neurobiology of sleep and circadian rhythms · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mu YangDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, MIND Institute, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California 95817, USA muyang@ucdavis.edu.
Freeman C LewisDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, MIND Institute, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California 95817, USA.
Michael S SarviDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, MIND Institute, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California 95817, USA.
Gillian M FoleyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, MIND Institute, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California 95817, USA.
Jacqueline N CrawleyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, MIND Institute, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California 95817, USA.
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal 16p11.2 deletion syndrome frequently presents with intellectual disabilities, speech delays, and autism. Here we investigated the Dolmetsch line of 16p11.2 heterozygous (+/-) mice on a range of cognitive tasks with different neuroanatomical substrates. Robust novel object recognition deficits were replicated in two cohorts of 16p11.2+/- mice, confirming previous findings. A similarly robust deficit in object location memory was discovered in +/-, indicating impaired spatial novelty recognition. Generalizability of novelty recognition deficits in +/- mice extended to preference for social novelty. Robust learning deficits and cognitive inflexibility were detected using Bussey-Saksida touchscreen operant chambers. During acquisition of pairwise visual discrimination, +/- mice required significantly more training trials to reach criterion than wild-type littermates (+/+), and made more errors and correction errors than +/+. In the reversal phase, all +/+ reached criterion, whereas most +/- failed to reach criterion by the 30-d cutoff. Contextual and cued fear conditioning were normal in +/-. These cognitive phenotypes may be relevant to some aspects of cognitive impairments in humans with 16p11.2 deletion, and support the use of 16p11.2+/- mice as a model system for discovering treatments for cognitive impairments in 16p11.2 deletion syndrome.

Indexed as

LearningRecognition, PsychologyAnimalsAutistic DisorderChromosome DeletionChromosome DisordersChromosomes, Human, Pair 16Cognition DisordersConditioning, PsychologicalCuesDiscrimination, PsychologicalFearFemaleHeterozygoteIntellectual DisabilityLearning Disabilities

Identifiers

PMID26572653
PMCPMC4749736
OpenAlexW2175711195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.