Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26572650›Full record

ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2015

Repeated stimulation of cultured networks of rat cortical neurons induces parallel memory traces.

Joost le Feber, Tim Witteveen, Tamar M van Veenendaal, Jelle Dijkstra

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Opportunities and Challenges of Brain-on-a-Chip Interfaces.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joost le FeberDepartment of Biomedical Signals and Systems, University of Twente, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Engineering and Technical Medicine, Enschede 7500 AE, The Netherlands Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Twente, Enschede 7500 AE, The Netherlands j.lefeber@utwente.nl.
Tim WitteveenDepartment of Biomedical Signals and Systems, University of Twente, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Engineering and Technical Medicine, Enschede 7500 AE, The Netherlands.
Tamar M van VeenendaalDepartment of Biomedical Signals and Systems, University of Twente, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Engineering and Technical Medicine, Enschede 7500 AE, The Netherlands Department of Radiology, Maastricht University, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht 6200 MD, The Netherlands.
Jelle DijkstraDepartment of Biomedical Signals and Systems, University of Twente, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Engineering and Technical Medicine, Enschede 7500 AE, The Netherlands.
University of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During systems consolidation, memories are spontaneously replayed favoring information transfer from hippocampus to neocortex. However, at present no empirically supported mechanism to accomplish a transfer of memory from hippocampal to extra-hippocampal sites has been offered. We used cultured neuronal networks on multielectrode arrays and small-scale computational models to study the effect of memory replay on the formation of memory traces. We show that input-deprived networks develop an activity⇔connectivity balance where dominant activity patterns support current connectivity. Electrical stimulation at one electrode disturbs this balance and induces connectivity changes. Intrinsic forces in recurrent networks lead to a new equilibrium with activity patterns that include the stimulus response. The new connectivity is no longer disrupted by this stimulus, indicating that networks memorize it. A different stimulus again induces connectivity changes upon first application but not subsequently, demonstrating the formation of a second memory trace. Returning to the first stimulus does not affect connectivity, indicating parallel storage of both traces. A computer model robustly reproduced experimental results, suggesting that spike-timing-dependent plasticity and short time depression suffice to store parallel memory traces, even in networks without particular circuitry constraints.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCells, CulturedComputer SimulationElectric StimulationMemoryMicroelectrodesModels, NeurologicalNeural PathwaysNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsRats, Wistar

Identifiers

PMID26572650
PMCPMC4749732
OpenAlexW2285358670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.