Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26572101›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Optogenetic stimulation reveals distinct modulatory properties of thalamostriatal vs corticostriatal glutamatergic inputs to fast-spiking interneurons.

Giuseppe Sciamanna, Giulia Ponterio, Georgia Mandolesi, Paola Bonsi, Antonio Pisani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Sensory Reinforced Corticostriatal Plasticity.Current neuropharmacology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Input-specific control of interneuron numbers in nascent striatal networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Dystonia and Cerebellum: From Bench to Bedside.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Make a Left Turn: Cortico-Striatal Circuitry Mediating the Attentional Control of Complex Movements.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2021
    Review
  18. Functional Connectome Analysis of the Striatum with Optogenetics.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  19. Fast spiking interneuron activity in primate striatum tracks learning of attention cues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe SciamannaUniversity of Rome "Tor Vergata", Dept. of Systems Medicine, via Montpellier 1 -00133, Rome.
Giulia PonterioFondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS, Neurophysiology and Plasticity lab, via Fosso di Fiorano 64 -00143, Rome.
Georgia MandolesiFondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS, Neurophysiology and Plasticity lab, via Fosso di Fiorano 64 -00143, Rome.
Paola BonsiFondazione Santa Lucia IRCCS, Neurophysiology and Plasticity lab, via Fosso di Fiorano 64 -00143, Rome.
Antonio PisaniUniversity of Rome "Tor Vergata", Dept. of Systems Medicine, via Montpellier 1 -00133, Rome.
Fondazione Santa Lucia · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parvalbumin-containing fast-spiking interneurons (FSIs) exert a powerful feed-forward GABAergic inhibition on striatal medium spiny neurons (MSNs), playing a critical role in timing striatal output. However, how glutamatergic inputs modulate their firing activity is still unexplored. Here, by means of a combined optogenetic and electrophysiological approach, we provide evidence for a differential modulation of cortico- vs thalamo-striatal synaptic inputs to FSIs in transgenic mice carrying light-gated ion channels channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) in glutamatergic fibers. Corticostriatal synapses show a postsynaptic facilitation, whereas thalamostriatal synapses present a postsynaptic depression. Moreover, thalamostriatal synapses exhibit more prominent AMPA-mediated currents than corticostriatal synapses, and an increased release probability. Furthermore, during current-evoked firing activity, simultaneous corticostriatal stimulation increases bursting activity. Conversely, thalamostriatal fiber activation shifts the canonical burst-pause activity to a more prolonged, regular firing pattern. However, this change in firing pattern was accompanied by a significant rise in the frequency of membrane potential oscillations. Notably, the responses to thalamic stimulation were fully abolished by blocking metabotropic glutamate 1 (mGlu1) receptor subtype, whereas both acetylcholine and dopamine receptor antagonists were ineffective. Our findings demonstrate that cortical and thalamic glutamatergic input differently modulate FSIs firing activity through specific intrinsic and synaptic properties, exerting a powerful influence on striatal outputs.

Indexed as

alpha-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic AcidAnimalsCalciumChannelrhodopsinsCorpus StriatumElectric StimulationExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsInterneuronsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, ConfocalN-MethylaspartatePatch-Clamp TechniquesRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSynapsesalpha-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic AcidCalciumChannelrhodopsinsN-MethylaspartateRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26572101
PMCPMC4647205
OpenAlexW2279516060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.