Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26571380›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Sensitivity of Human Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Subtypes to Chemotherapeutics and Molecular Targeted Agents: A Study on Primary Cell Cultures.

Alice Fraveto, Vincenzo Cardinale, Maria Consiglia Bragazzi, Felice Giuliante, Agostino Maria De Rose, Gian Luca Grazi, Chiara Napoletano, Rossella Semeraro, Anna Maria Lustri, Daniele Costantini and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. mTOR Inhibitors in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alice FravetoDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo CardinaleDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Maria Consiglia BragazziDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Felice GiulianteSurgery, Hepatobiliary Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart School of Medicine, Rome, Italy.
Agostino Maria De RoseSurgery, Hepatobiliary Unit, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart School of Medicine, Rome, Italy.
Gian Luca GraziHepato-Biliary Surgery, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Chiara NapoletanoExperimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Rossella SemeraroDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Anna Maria LustriDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Daniele CostantiniDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Lorenzo NeviDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sabina Di MatteoDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Anastasia RenziSAIMLAL, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Guido CarpinoHealth Science, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
Eugenio GaudioSAIMLAL, Sapienza, University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Domenico AlvaroDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITForo Italico University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the sensitivity of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCCA) subtypes to chemotherapeutics and molecular targeted agents. Primary cultures of mucin- and mixed-IHCCA were prepared from surgical specimens (N. 18 IHCCA patients) and evaluated for cell proliferation (MTS assay) and apoptosis (Caspase 3) after incubation (72 hours) with increasing concentrations of different drugs. In vivo, subcutaneous human tumor xenografts were evaluated. Primary cultures of mucin- and mixed-IHCCA were characterized by a different pattern of expression of cancer stem cell markers, and by a different drug sensitivity. Gemcitabine and the Gemcitabine-Cisplatin combination were more active in inhibiting cell proliferation in mixed-IHCCA while Cisplatin or Abraxane were more effective against mucin-IHCCA, where Abraxane also enhances apoptosis. 5-Fluoracil showed a slight inhibitory effect on cell proliferation that was more significant in mixed- than mucin-IHCCA primary cultures and, induced apoptosis only in mucin-IHCCA. Among Hg inhibitors, LY2940680 and Vismodegib showed slight effects on proliferation of both IHCCA subtypes. The tyrosine kinase inhibitors, Imatinib Mesylate and Sorafenib showed significant inhibitory effects on proliferation of both mucin- and mixed-IHCCA. The MEK 1/2 inhibitor, Selumetinib, inhibited proliferation of only mucin-IHCCA while the aminopeptidase-N inhibitor, Bestatin was more active against mixed-IHCCA. The c-erbB2 blocking antibody was more active against mixed-IHCCA while, the Wnt inhibitor, LGK974, similarly inhibited proliferation of mucin- and mixed-IHCCA. Either mucin- or mixed-IHCCA showed high sensitivity to nanomolar concentrations of the dual PI3-kinase/mTOR inhibitor, NVP-BEZ235. In vivo, in subcutaneous xenografts, either NVP-BEZ235 or Abraxane, blocked tumor growth. In conclusion, mucin- and mixed-IHCCA are characterized by a different drug sensitivity. Cisplatin, Abraxane and the MEK 1/2 inhibitor, Selumetinib were more active against mucin-IHCCA while, Gemcitabine, Gemcitabine-Cisplatin combination, the c-erbB2 blocking antibody and bestatin worked better against mixed-IHCCA. Remarkably, we identified a dual PI3-kinase/mTOR inhibitor that both in vitro and in vivo, exerts dramatic antiproliferative effects against both mucin- and mixed-IHCCA.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlbumin-Bound PaclitaxelAnilidesAnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsApoptosisBenzimidazolesBile Duct NeoplasmsCell ProliferationCholangiocarcinomaCisplatinDeoxycytidineDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorFemaleFluorouracilAlbumin-Bound PaclitaxelAnilidesAZD 6244BenzimidazolesCisplatinDeoxycytidineFluorouracilGemcitabineHhAntag691LY2940680MucinsPhthalazinesPyridines

Identifiers

PMID26571380
PMCPMC4646673
OpenAlexW2177450918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.