Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26571125›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2015

Convergent Evolution During Local Adaptation to Patchy Landscapes.

Peter L Ralph, Graham Coop

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Life-history trade-offs explain local adaptation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The paradox of adaptive trait clines with nonclinal patterns in the underlying genes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Lack of gene flow betweenEvolutionary applications · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Population genomics perspectives on convergent adaptation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  18. Genomic divergence and adaptive convergence inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter L RalphComputational Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Graham CoopEvolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Recombination rate variation and evolution in vertebratesR01GM083098 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI PRZEWORSKI, MOLLY F · 2007 to 2024
$4.6M
Genome-wide approaches to polygenic adaptationR01GM108779 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI COOP, GRAHAM · 2014 to 2019
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083098NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM107374NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108779NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM83098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Species often encounter, and adapt to, many patches of similar environmental conditions across their range. Such adaptation can occur through convergent evolution if different alleles arise in different patches, or through the spread of shared alleles by migration acting to synchronize adaptation across the species. The tension between the two reflects the constraint imposed on evolution by the underlying genetic architecture versus how effectively selection and geographic isolation act to inhibit the geographic spread of locally adapted alleles. This paper studies the balance between these two routes to adaptation in a model of continuous environments with patchy selection pressures. We address the following questions: How long does it take for a novel allele to appear in a patch where it is locally adapted through mutation? Or, through migration from another, already adapted patch? Which is more likely to occur, as a function of distance between the patches? What population genetic signal is left by the spread of migrant alleles? To answer these questions we examine the family structure underlying migration-selection equilibrium surrounding an already adapted patch, treating those rare families that reach new patches as spatial branching processes. A main result is that patches further apart than a critical distance will likely evolve independent locally adapted alleles; this distance is proportional to the spatial scale of selection ([Formula: see text], where σ is the dispersal distance and sm is the selective disadvantage of these alleles between patches), and depends linearly on log(sm/μ), where μ is the mutation rate. This provides a way to understand the role of geographic separation between patches in promoting convergent adaptation and the genomic signals it leaves behind. We illustrate these ideas using the convergent evolution of cryptic coloration in the rock pocket mouse, Chaetodipus intermedius, as an empirical example.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAdaptation, PhysiologicalMutationSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID26571125
PMCPMC4646681
OpenAlexW2949987341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.