ArticlePLoS genetics2015
Convergent Evolution During Local Adaptation to Patchy Landscapes.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Experimental Validation of Genome-Environment Associations in Arabidopsis.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Life-history trade-offs explain local adaptation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Establishment of a locally adaptive allele in multidimensional continuous space.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- The paradox of adaptive trait clines with nonclinal patterns in the underlying genes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Long-term evolution of quantitative traits in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup.Genetica · 2022Article
- Population genetic models for the spatial spread of adaptive variants: A review in light of SARS-CoV-2 evolution.PLoS genetics · 2022Review
- Repeated genetic adaptation to altitude in two tropical butterflies.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Review
- Analysis of Genomic DNA from Medieval Plague Victims Suggests Long-Term Effect of Yersinia pestis on Human Immunity Genes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- The population genomics of adaptive loss of function.Heredity · 2021Review
- Rapid parallel adaptation despite gene flow in silent crickets.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Polygenic adaptation: a unifying framework to understand positive selection.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2020Review
- Lack of gene flow betweenEvolutionary applications · 2020Article
- The population genetics of crypsis in vertebrates: recent insights from mice, hares, and lizards.Heredity · 2020Review
- Genomic architecture of parallel ecological divergence: Beyond a single environmental contrast.Science advances · 2019Article
- Population genomics perspectives on convergent adaptation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019Review
- Genomic divergence and adaptive convergence inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Spatial soft sweeps: Patterns of adaptation in populations with long-range dispersal.PLoS genetics · 2019Article
- Drought adaptation ineLife · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Species often encounter, and adapt to, many patches of similar environmental conditions across their range. Such adaptation can occur through convergent evolution if different alleles arise in different patches, or through the spread of shared alleles by migration acting to synchronize adaptation across the species. The tension between the two reflects the constraint imposed on evolution by the underlying genetic architecture versus how effectively selection and geographic isolation act to inhibit the geographic spread of locally adapted alleles. This paper studies the balance between these two routes to adaptation in a model of continuous environments with patchy selection pressures. We address the following questions: How long does it take for a novel allele to appear in a patch where it is locally adapted through mutation? Or, through migration from another, already adapted patch? Which is more likely to occur, as a function of distance between the patches? What population genetic signal is left by the spread of migrant alleles? To answer these questions we examine the family structure underlying migration-selection equilibrium surrounding an already adapted patch, treating those rare families that reach new patches as spatial branching processes. A main result is that patches further apart than a critical distance will likely evolve independent locally adapted alleles; this distance is proportional to the spatial scale of selection ([Formula: see text], where σ is the dispersal distance and sm is the selective disadvantage of these alleles between patches), and depends linearly on log(sm/μ), where μ is the mutation rate. This provides a way to understand the role of geographic separation between patches in promoting convergent adaptation and the genomic signals it leaves behind. We illustrate these ideas using the convergent evolution of cryptic coloration in the rock pocket mouse, Chaetodipus intermedius, as an empirical example.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.