Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26571021›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Head-to-Head Comparison of Soluble vs. Qβ VLP Circumsporozoite Protein Vaccines Reveals Selective Enhancement of NANP Repeat Responses.

Farhat Khan, Mike Porter, Robert Schwenk, Margot DeBot, Philippe Saudan, Sheetij Dutta

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Restricted valency (NPNA)NPJ vaccines · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Advancements in protein nanoparticle vaccine platforms to combat infectious disease.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Eliminating Factor H-Binding Activity ofFrontiers in immunology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Farhat KhanStructural Vaccinology Laboratory, Malaria Vaccine Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910, United States of America.
Mike PorterStructural Vaccinology Laboratory, Malaria Vaccine Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910, United States of America.
Robert SchwenkStructural Vaccinology Laboratory, Malaria Vaccine Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910, United States of America.
Margot DeBotStructural Vaccinology Laboratory, Malaria Vaccine Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910, United States of America.
Philippe SaudanCytos Biotechnology, Wagistrasse 25, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland.
Sheetij DuttaStructural Vaccinology Laboratory, Malaria Vaccine Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910, United States of America.
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circumsporozoite protein (CSP) of Plasmodium falciparum is a promising malaria vaccine target. RTS,S, the most advanced malaria vaccine candidate consists of the central NANP repeat and carboxy-terminal region of CSP displayed on a hepatitis B virus-like particle (VLP). To build upon the success of RTS,S, we produced a near full-length Plasmodium falciparum CSP that also includes the conserved amino-terminal region of CSP. We recently showed that this soluble CSP, combined with a synthetic Toll-like-receptor-4 (TLR4) agonist in stable oil-in-water emulsion (GLA/SE), induces a potent and protective immune response in mice against transgenic parasite challenge. Here we have investigated whether the immunogenicity of soluble CSP could be further augmented by presentation on a VLP. Bacteriophage Qβ VLPs can be readily produced in E.coli, they have a diameter of 25 nm and contain packaged E. coli RNA which serves as a built in adjuvant through the activation of TLR7/8. CSP was chemically conjugated to Qβ and the CSP-Qβ vaccine immunogenicity and efficacy were compared to adjuvanted soluble CSP in the C57Bl/6 mouse model. When formulated with adjuvants lacking a TLR4 agonist (Alum, SE and Montanide) the Qβ-CSP induced higher anti-NANP repeat titers, higher levels of cytophilic IgG2b/c antibodies and a trend towards higher protection against transgenic parasite challenge as compared to soluble CSP formulated in the same adjuvant. The VLP and soluble CSP immunogenicity difference was most pronounced at low antigen dose, and within the CSP molecule, the titers against the NANP repeats were preferentially enhanced by Qβ presentation. While a TLR4 agonist enhanced the immunogenicity of soluble CSP to levels comparable to the VLP vaccine, the TLR4 agonist did not further improve the immunogenicity of the Qβ-CSP vaccine. The data presented here pave the way for further improvement in the Qβ conjugation chemistry and evaluation of both the Qβ-CSP and soluble CSP vaccines in the non-human primate model.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAllolevivirusAlum CompoundsAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanDisease Models, AnimalEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEpitopesEscherichia coliFemaleImmune SystemImmunoglobulin GLipopolysaccharidesMalariaMalaria VaccinesMiceAdjuvants, ImmunologicAlum Compoundsaluminum sulfateAntibodies, Protozoancircumsporozoite protein, ProtozoanEpitopesImmunoglobulin GLipopolysaccharidesMalaria VaccinesProtozoan ProteinsRecombinant ProteinsRNA, BacterialTlr4 protein, mouseToll-Like Receptor 4Vaccines, SyntheticVaccines, Virus-Like Particle

Identifiers

PMID26571021
PMCPMC4646581
OpenAlexW2180513997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.