ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2015
Wildlife in U.S. Cities: Managing Unwanted Animals.
Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Induced breeding failure alters movements, migratory phenology, and opportunities for pathogen spread in an urban gull population.Movement ecology · 2025Article
- The use of seismically isolated buildings by urban wildlife in Japan.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2024Article
- Animals and Cities: A Reflection on Their Potential in Innovating Nature-Based Solutions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Human-Wildlife Coexistence in Urban Wildlife Management: Insights from Nonlethal Predator Management and Rodenticide Bans.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Spatial Concentrations of Wildlife Attacks on Humans in Chitwan National Park, Nepal.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- A moral panic over cats.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2019Article
- Human-attacks by an urban raptor are tied to human subsidies and religious practices.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- "Feelings and Fitness" Not "Feelings or Fitness"-TheFrontiers in veterinary science · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conflicts between people and wild animals in cities are undoubtedly as old as urban living itself. In the United States it is only of late, however, that many of the species now found in cities have come to live there. The increasing kind and number of human-wildlife conflicts in urbanizing environments makes it a priority that effective and humane means of conflict resolution be found. The urban public wants conflicts with wildlife resolved humanely, but needs to know what the alternative management approaches are, and what ethical standards should guide their use. This paper examines contemporary urban wildlife control in the United States with a focus on the moral concerns this raises. Much of the future for urban wildlife will depend on reform in governance, but much as well will depend on cultural changes that promote greater respect and understanding for wild animals and the biotic communities of which they and we are both a part.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.