Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26569183›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in HIV and AIDS2016

What people want from sex and preexposure prophylaxis.

Robert M Grant, Kimberly A Koester

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in HIV and AIDS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert M GrantaGladstone Institutes bUniversity of California cSan Francisco AIDS Foundation, San Francisco, California, USA.
Kimberly A Koester

Funding

Chemoprophylaxis for HIV Prevention in Men SupplementU01AI064002 · NIAID · J. DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES · PI GRANT, ROBERT M. · 2005 to 2011
$41.3M
Chemoprophylaxis and HIV-Host InteractionsR01AI062333 · NIAID · J. DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES · PI GRANT, ROBERT M. · 2004 to 2011
$6.2M
Chemoprophylaxis and HIV Host InteractionsR01AI118575 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRANT, ROBERT M. · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI062333NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI118575NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI064002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAs demand for preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) increases, we are learning more about what people want from sex and PrEP. RECENT

findingsPrEP demand has reached a tipping point in the USA and is increasing rapidly. Although the primary benefit of PrEP use is biological, to reduce risk of HIV infection, PrEP users often express an alternative set of social and emotional benefits that are provided by PrEP. These collateral benefits of PrEP have salience, affect, and are experienced in the present, which are compelling drivers of human behavior. PrEP use has been associated with feeling safe during sex, usually in contrast to ruminations related to fear of HIV or intimate partner violence or control. PrEP can create empowerment, or agency, defined as the capacity and autonomy to act on one's own behalf, because it provides control over one's vulnerability to HIV and relief to women and men who may otherwise worry about whether their partners will use a condom, take antiretroviral therapy, or disclose their HIV status accurately. Planning for sexual and social goals in calm moments is also empowering. These highly desired collateral benefits of PrEP could be undermined, or eliminated, if PrEP is implemented in ways that are coercive or that foment fear of sexual risk compensation, drug resistance, toxicity, or moral judgment. SUMMARY: Current PrEP implementation provides direct and indirect benefits that are highly desired.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsChemopreventionDisease Transmission, InfectiousEmtricitabineFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMalePre-Exposure ProphylaxisSafe SexTenofovirUnited StatesAnti-HIV AgentsEmtricitabineTenofovir

Identifiers

PMID26569183
PMCPMC6446930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.