Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26568957›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2015

Computational Depth of Anesthesia via Multiple Vital Signs Based on Artificial Neural Networks.

Muammar Sadrawi, Shou-Zen Fan, Maysam F Abbod, Kuo-Kuang Jen, Jiann-Shing Shieh

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Quantitative assessment of consciousness during anesthesia without EEG data.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Muammar SadrawiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Innovation Center for Big Data and Digital Convergence, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan, Chung-Li 32003, Taiwan.
Shou-Zen FanDepartment of Anestheology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan.
Maysam F AbbodDepartment of Electronic and Computer Engineering, Brunel University London, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK.
Kuo-Kuang JenMissile & Rocket System Research Division, National Chung-Shan Institute of Science and Technology, Taoyuan, Longtan 32500, Taiwan.
Jiann-Shing ShiehDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Innovation Center for Big Data and Digital Convergence, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan, Chung-Li 32003, Taiwan ; Center of Biomarkers and Translational Medicine, National Central University, Chung-Li 32001, Taiwan.
Brunel University of London · GBNational Central University · TWNational Chung Shan Institute of Science and Technology · TWNational Taiwan University · TWYuan Ze University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the depth of anesthesia (DoA) index using artificial neural networks (ANN) which is performed as the modeling technique. Totally 63-patient data is addressed, for both modeling and testing of 17 and 46 patients, respectively. The empirical mode decomposition (EMD) is utilized to purify between the electroencephalography (EEG) signal and the noise. The filtered EEG signal is subsequently extracted to achieve a sample entropy index by every 5-second signal. Then, it is combined with other mean values of vital signs, that is, electromyography (EMG), heart rate (HR), pulse, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and signal quality index (SQI) to evaluate the DoA index as the input. The 5 doctor scores are averaged to obtain an output index. The mean absolute error (MAE) is utilized as the performance evaluation. 10-fold cross-validation is performed in order to generalize the model. The ANN model is compared with the bispectral index (BIS). The results show that the ANN is able to produce lower MAE than BIS. For the correlation coefficient, ANN also has higher value than BIS tested on the 46-patient testing data. Sensitivity analysis and cross-validation method are applied in advance. The results state that EMG has the most effecting parameter, significantly.

Indexed as

Nerve NetAdultAnesthetics, GeneralConsciousnessDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedElectrocardiographyElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansIntraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringMaleMiddle AgedPattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityVital SignsAnesthetics, General

Identifiers

PMID26568957
PMCPMC4621366
OpenAlexW1920871857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.