Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26568727›Full record

ArticleHand (New York, N.Y.)2015

The effect of operative technique on ulnar nerve strain following surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome.

Justin Mitchell, John C Dunn, Nicholas Kusnezov, Julia Bader, Derek F Ipsen, Christopher L Forthman, Aaron Dykstra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Justin MitchellDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, 5055 N. Piedras, Fort Bliss, TX 79920 USA.
John C DunnDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, 5055 N. Piedras, Fort Bliss, TX 79920 USA.
Nicholas KusnezovDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, 5055 N. Piedras, Fort Bliss, TX 79920 USA.
Julia BaderDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, 5055 N. Piedras, Fort Bliss, TX 79920 USA.
Derek F IpsenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Capital Consortium, 8901 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20889 USA.
Christopher L ForthmanCurtis National Hand Center, 210 E 33rd St., Baltimore, MD 21218 USA.
Aaron DykstraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Capital Consortium, 8901 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20889 USA.
William Beaumont Army Medical Center · USClinical Research Consortium · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study is to compare the amount of strain on the ulnar nerve based on elbow position after in situ release, subcutaneous transposition, submuscular transposition, and medial epicondylectomy.

methodsSix matched cadaver upper extremity pairs underwent ulnar nerve decompression, transposition in a sequential fashion, while five elbows underwent medial epicondylectomy. A differential variable reluctance transducer (DVRT) was placed in the ulnar nerve. An in situ release, a subcutaneous transposition, and a submuscular transposition were performed sequentially with the strain being measured after each procedure in neutral, full elbow flexion, and extension positions. The strain was then averaged and compared for each procedure. Five cadavers underwent medial epicondylectomy and were similarly tested.

resultsAfter the in situ release, there was no statistically significant change in strain in either flexion or extension. After a subcutaneous transposition, there was a statistically significant decrease in strain in full elbow flexion but not in extension. Similarly after a submuscular transposition, there was a statistically significant decrease in strain in full flexion but not in extension. There was not a statistically significant change in strain with medial epicondylectomy.

conclusionAn in situ release of the ulnar nerve at the elbow may relieve pressure on the nerve but does not address the problem of strain which may be the underlying pathology in many cases of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE). Transposition of the ulnar nerve anterior to the medial epicondyle addresses the problem of strain on the ulnar nerve. In addition, it does not create an increased strain on the ulnar nerve with elbow extension.

Indexed as

Cubital tunnel syndromeNeuropathyUlnar nerve entrapment

Identifiers

PMID26568727
PMCPMC4641079
OpenAlexW264522570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.