Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26568684›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental neuroscience2015

Adult Astrogenesis and the Etiology of Cortical Neurodegeneration.

Tal C Mohn, Andrew O Koob

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Astrogenic Balance in the Aging Brain.Current neuropharmacology · 2021
    Review
  8. Glial cells in Parkinson´s disease: protective or deleterious?Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. AstrogenesisNeural regeneration research · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tal C MohnBiology Department, University of Wisconsin-River Falls, River Falls, Wisconsin, USA.
Andrew O KoobBiology Department, University of Wisconsin-River Falls, River Falls, Wisconsin, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As more evidence points to a clear role for astrocytes in synaptic processing, synaptogenesis and cognition, continuing research on astrocytic function could lead to strategies for neurodegenerative disease prevention. Reactive astrogliosis results in astrocyte proliferation early in injury and disease states and is considered neuroprotective, indicating a role for astrocytes in disease etiology. This review describes the different types of human cortical astrocytes and the current evidence regarding adult cortical astrogenesis in injury and degenerative disease. A role for disrupted astrogenesis as a cause of cortical degeneration, with a focus on the tauopathies and synucleinopathies, will also be considered.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseastrocytedementia with Lewy bodiesgliogenesisgliosisneurogenesis

Identifiers

PMID26568684
PMCPMC4634839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.