Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26568629›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016

Accurate estimation of isoelectric point of protein and peptide based on amino acid sequences.

Enrique Audain, Yassel Ramos, Henning Hermjakob, Darren R Flower, Yasset Perez-Riverol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Functional Annotation of Hypothetical Proteins From theBioinformatics and biology insights · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Enrique AudainDepartment of Proteomics, Center of Molecular Immunology.
Yassel RamosDepartment of Proteomics, Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba.
Henning HermjakobDepartment European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK and.
Darren R FlowerSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK.
Yasset Perez-RiverolDepartment European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK and.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K01997X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationIn any macromolecular polyprotic system-for example protein, DNA or RNA-the isoelectric point-commonly referred to as the pI-can be defined as the point of singularity in a titration curve, corresponding to the solution pH value at which the net overall surface charge-and thus the electrophoretic mobility-of the ampholyte sums to zero. Different modern analytical biochemistry and proteomics methods depend on the isoelectric point as a principal feature for protein and peptide characterization. Protein separation by isoelectric point is a critical part of 2-D gel electrophoresis, a key precursor of proteomics, where discrete spots can be digested in-gel, and proteins subsequently identified by analytical mass spectrometry. Peptide fractionation according to their pI is also widely used in current proteomics sample preparation procedures previous to the LC-MS/MS analysis. Therefore accurate theoretical prediction of pI would expedite such analysis. While such pI calculation is widely used, it remains largely untested, motivating our efforts to benchmark pI prediction methods.

resultsUsing data from the database PIP-DB and one publically available dataset as our reference gold standard, we have undertaken the benchmarking of pI calculation methods. We find that methods vary in their accuracy and are highly sensitive to the choice of basis set. The machine-learning algorithms, especially the SVM-based algorithm, showed a superior performance when studying peptide mixtures. In general, learning-based pI prediction methods (such as Cofactor, SVM and Branca) require a large training dataset and their resulting performance will strongly depend of the quality of that data. In contrast with Iterative methods, machine-learning algorithms have the advantage of being able to add new features to improve the accuracy of prediction. CONTACT: yperez@ebi.ac.uk AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software and data are freely available at https://github.com/ypriverol/pIRSupplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceIsoelectric FocusingIsoelectric PointPeptidesProteomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryPeptides

Identifiers

PMID26568629
PMCPMC5939969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.