Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26568626›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016

Metabolic network-guided binning of metagenomic sequence fragments.

Matthew B Biggs, Jason A Papin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew B BiggsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22903 USA.
Jason A PapinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22903 USA.

Funding

BIOTECHNOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008715 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI LAURIE, GORDON WILLIAM · 2000 to 2019
$6.6M
Mapping and predicting metabolic fluxes between the ileal microbiome and hostR01GM108501 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI PAPIN, JASON · 2014 to 2017
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108501NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationMost microbes on Earth have never been grown in a laboratory, and can only be studied through DNA sequences. Environmental DNA sequence samples are complex mixtures of fragments from many different species, often unknown. There is a pressing need for methods that can reliably reconstruct genomes from complex metagenomic samples in order to address questions in ecology, bioremediation, and human health.

resultsWe present the SOrting by NEtwork Completion (SONEC) approach for assigning reactions to incomplete metabolic networks based on a metabolite connectivity score. We successfully demonstrate proof of concept in a set of 100 genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions, and delineate the variables that impact reaction assignment accuracy. We further demonstrate the integration of SONEC with existing approaches (such as cross-sample scaffold abundance profile clustering) on a set of 94 metagenomic samples from the Human Microbiome Project. We show that not only does SONEC aid in reconstructing species-level genomes, but it also improves functional predictions made with the resulting metabolic networks. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The datasets and code presented in this work are available at: https://bitbucket.org/mattbiggs/sorting_by_network_completion/ CONTACT: papin@virginia.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

MetagenomicsAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisHumansMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID26568626
PMCPMC6169484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.