Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26568451›Full record

SynthesisNature communications2015

Increased tolerance to humans among disturbed wildlife.

Diogo S M Samia, Shinichi Nakagawa, Fausto Nomura, Thiago F Rangel, Daniel T Blumstein

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nature communications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Understanding mammal avoidance of human settlements.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026
    Article
  4. Wolves fear humans but learn quickly about us.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Do Peri-Urban Areas Act as Refuges for the European Rabbit (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Diogo S M SamiaDepartment of Ecology, Federal University of Goiás, CP. 131, 74001-970 Goiânia, Brazil.
Shinichi NakagawaDepartment of Zoology, University of Otago, 340 Great King Street, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7765-5182
Fausto NomuraDepartment of Ecology, Federal University of Goiás, CP. 131, 74001-970 Goiânia, Brazil.
Thiago F RangelDepartment of Ecology, Federal University of Goiás, CP. 131, 74001-970 Goiânia, Brazil.
Daniel T BlumsteinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, 621 Young Drive South, Los Angeles, California 90095-1606, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5793-9244

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human disturbance drives the decline of many species, both directly and indirectly. Nonetheless, some species do particularly well around humans. One mechanism that may explain coexistence is the degree to which a species tolerates human disturbance. Here we provide a comprehensive meta-analysis of birds, mammals and lizards to investigate species tolerance of human disturbance and explore the drivers of this tolerance in birds. We find that, overall, disturbed populations of the three major taxa are more tolerant of human disturbance than less disturbed populations. The best predictors of the direction and magnitude of bird tolerance of human disturbance are the type of disturbed area (urbanized birds are more tolerant than rural or suburban populations) and body mass (large birds are more tolerant than small birds). By identifying specific features associated with tolerance, these results guide evidence-based conservation strategies to predict and manage the impacts of increasing human disturbance on birds.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemSocial BehaviorAnimalsAnimals, WildAntelopesBirdsBody WeightDeerEquidaeHumansLagomorphaLizardsRural PopulationSciuridae

Identifiers

PMID26568451
PMCPMC4660219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.