Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26568428›Full record

Trial reportArthritis research & therapy2015

Twenty-eight-week results from the REALISTIC phase IIIb randomized trial: efficacy, safety and predictability of response to certolizumab pegol in a diverse rheumatoid arthritis population.

Michael E Weinblatt, Roy Fleischmann, Ronald F van Vollenhoven, Paul Emery, Tom W J Huizinga, Maurizio Cutolo, Désirée van der Heijde, Benjamin Duncan, Owen Davies, Kristel Luijtens and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis research & therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00717236 (A Phase IIIb Multicenter Study With a 12-week Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Period Followed by an Open-label, Extension Phase Evaluating Safety/Efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol Given to Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis.), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00717236 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase IIIb Multicenter Study With a 12-week Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Period Followed by an Open-label, Extension Phase Evaluating Safety/Efficacy of Certolizumab Pegol Given to Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUCB PharmaRan2008 to 2011Enrolled1,648ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsCertolizumab pegol (CZP), Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Certolizumab pegol (CDP870) for rheumatoid arthritis in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Piggybacked by PEGylation?The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Michael E WeinblattBrigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. mweinblatt@partners.org.
Roy FleischmannDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 8144 Walnut Hill Lane, Dallas, TX, 75231, USA. RFleischmann@arthdocs.com.
Ronald F van VollenhovenKarolinska Institute, Solnavägen 1, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. ronald.van.vollenhoven@ki.se.
Paul EmeryLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Chapeltown Road, Leeds, LS7 4SA, UK. p.emery@leeds.ac.uk.
Tom W J HuizingaDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands. T.W.J.Huizinga@lumc.nl.
Maurizio CutoloResearch Laboratory and Academic Unit of Clinical Rheumatology, University of Genova, Viale Benedetto XV, 6, 16132, Genova, Italy. mcutolo@unige.it.
Désirée van der HeijdeDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands. mail@dvanderheijde.nl.
Benjamin DuncanUCB Pharma, 8010 Arco Corporate Drive, Raleigh, NC, 27617, USA. Benjamin.Duncan@ucb.com.
Owen DaviesUCB Pharma, Allée de la Recherche 60, 1070, Brussels, Belgium. owen.davies@ucb.com.
Kristel LuijtensUCB Pharma, 8010 Arco Corporate Drive, Raleigh, NC, 27617, USA. Kristel.Luijtens@ucb.com.
Maxime DougadosParis-Descartes University, 12 Rue de l'École de Médecine, 75006, Paris, France. maxime.dougados@cch.aphp.fr.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLUCB Pharma (United States) · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDélégation Paris 5 · FRKarolinska Institutet · SEUCB Pharma (Belgium) · BEUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis 28-week, phase IIIb study assessed safety and maintenance of response to certolizumab pegol (CZP) in a diverse population of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, stratified by prior anti-TNF exposure, concomitant methotrexate (MTX) use and disease duration. The ability to predict achievement of low disease activity (LDA) at week 28 from improvements in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), swollen joint count (SJC) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) up to week 12 was assessed.

methodsThe 28-week study population included all patients who completed the double-blind (DB) phase and entered the open-label (OL) phase, receiving 200 mg CZP every 2 weeks (Q2W) ≥16 weeks. In the 12-week DB period, patients with active RA and an inadequate response to ≥1 disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) were randomized 4:1 to CZP (400 mg at weeks 0, 2 and 4 then 200 mg Q2W) or placebo (Q2W), stratified by prior anti-TNF use, concomitant use of MTX and disease duration (<2 years vs. ≥2 years).

resultsA total of 955 patients entered the OL phase. At week 28, similar clinical improvements were seen in those receiving CZP throughout (CZP → CZP; n = 771) and those receiving placebo during the DB phase and switching to CZP in the OL phase (placebo → CZP; n = 184) (ACR20 response rate = 59.7% vs. 53.3%; ACR50/ACR70 response rates were also similar). Effect of CZP treatment was similar regardless of prior anti-TNF use, disease duration and concomitant DMARDs, based on ACR20 response rates. The percentage of patients achieving DAS28(ESR) LDA at week 28 was calculated for DAS28(ESR), SJC or CDAI responders at earlier time points. Reductions from baseline (Δ) of DAS28(ESR) <1.2, ΔSJC <25% or ΔCDAI <10 by week 12 were associated with <9% chance of achieving LDA at week 28 regardless of prior anti-TNF exposure. Adverse event rates were similar for placebo → CZP and CZP → CZP patients, with no new safety signals identified.

conclusionsA diverse population of RA patients with varying disease duration showed rapid and sustained clinical improvements on CZP treatment, regardless of prior anti-TNF or concomitant DMARD use. Failure to achieve improvements in DAS28(ESR), SJC or CDAI within the first 12 weeks of CZP therapy was associated with a low chance of achieving LDA at week 28. No new safety signals were observed.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00717236 , 15 July 2008.

Indexed as

AgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidCertolizumab PegolDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInflammation MediatorsMaleMiddle AgedNasopharyngitisPredictive Value of TestsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsCertolizumab PegolInflammation Mediators

Identifiers

PMID26568428
PMCPMC4644627
OpenAlexW2172742237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.