ArticleDeutsches Arzteblatt international2015
The Validity of Advance Directives in Acute Situations.
Article in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05575791 (Evaluation of Preoperative Acceptance of Proactive Palliative Care Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Preoperative Acceptance of Proactive Palliative Care Intervention
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- "SpezPat"- common advance directives versus disease-centred advance directives: a randomised controlled pilot study on the impact on physicians' understanding of non-small cell lung cancer patients' end-of-life decisions.BMC palliative care · 2022Trial
- [General practitioner consultation on advance directives - results of a survey of general practitioners in Lower Saxony].Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026Article
- [Opportunities and risks of advance directives : An appraisal of the practice in Germany after legal regulation in 2009].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Review
- Doctor's Perceptions of the Systemic Influences on Advance Care Plan Application: A Thematic Analysis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- [Palliative aspects in clinical acute and emergency medicine as well as intensive care medicine : Consensus paper of the DGIIN, DGK, DGP, DGHO, DGfN, DGNI, DGG, DGAI, DGINA and DG Palliativmedizin].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2023Review
- End-of-life practices in 11 German intensive care units : Results from the ETHICUS-2 study.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2023Article
- Moral Distress and Moral Injury Among Attending Neurosurgeons: A National Survey.Neurosurgery · 2022Article
- [Living wills of residents in nursing homes - which treatment situations and treatment measures are decreed?]Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2021Article
- [Advance care planning in critical care : Potential and requirements].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2021Review
- End-of-Life Care Decision-Making in Stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
- Multidisciplinary Clinicians and the Relational Autonomy of Persons with Neurodegenerative Disorders and an Advance Care Plan: A Thematic Analysis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2021Article
- [Advance care planning during the coronavirus pandemic-A chance for patient autonomy in acute situations].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2020Article
- Hospitalization and Intensive Therapy at the End of Life.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019Observational
- [Patient advanced directives from the perspective of surgery patients-new aspects and aims : Living wills of patients before planned surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2019Article
- [Nonbeneficial care-a burden for clinicians and relatives].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2019Review
- Advance Directives and Powers of Attorney in Intensive Care Patients.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017Article
- [Quality of dying processes after commencement of the German Living Will Act : Experiences of a surgical intensive care unit].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017Article
- [Pre-operative documentation of individual in-patient therapy goals : A medical staff questionnaire].Der Anaesthesist · 2016Article
- [Preoperative patient-oriented advance planning of emergency and intensive care treatment--Necessary or imposition? : Questionnaire survey].Der Anaesthesist · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNearly every fourth person in Germany has an advance directive that is to be used in certain medical situations. It is questionable, however, whether advance directives truly influence important treatment decisions in the intensive care unit. We studied the extent to which doctors and patients' relatives agree on the applicability of advance directives in the acute setting.
methodsA prospective study was carried out by questionnaire among the physicians and relatives of 50 patients with advance directives who were hospitalized on four different multidisciplinary intensive care units. The answers of 25 residents in training, 14 senior physicians, and 19 relatives were analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. The extent of agreement was assessed by means of Gwet's AC1 with linear weighting.
resultsIn most of the advance directives, the conditions under which they were meant to apply were stated in broad, general terms in prewritten blocks of text. 23 of the 50 patients (46%) died. All relatives stated that they were very familiar with the patients' wishes; 18 of 19 were legally responsible for decision-making. In assessing whether the advance directive was applicable to the situation at hand, the strength of agreement between physicians and relatives as well as between the two groups of physicians was only fair and non-significant (0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.01 to 0.71; p = 0.059 and 0.24; 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.50; p = 0.079). The relatives found the advance directives more useful than the doctors did (median, 5 vs. 3 [p = 0.018] on a Likert scale ranging from 0 [not useful at all] to 5 [very useful]) and favored their literal application (median, 5 vs. 4 [p = 0.018] on a Likert scale ranging from 0 [favoring the doctor's interpretation] to 5 [favoring literal application]). 30 days after the decision, 13 relatives (68%) felt that the patient's wishes had been fully complied with.
conclusionThese groups' clearly differing assessments of the applicability of advance directives imply that the currently most common types of advance directive are not suitable for use in intensive care. In order to support patients' relatives in their role as surrogate participants in decision-making, improved advance directives should be developed, and their implementation should be incorporated into the training and continuing medical education of intensive-care physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.