Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26568056›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2015

Employing human rights frameworks to realize access to an HIV cure.

Benjamin Mason Meier, Adriane Gelpi, Matthew M Kavanagh, Lisa Forman, Joseph J Amon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The social stigma of HIV-AIDS: society's role.HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. HIV Vaccine Awareness Day: sustaining the momentum.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2016
    Article
  12. Erratum.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Benjamin Mason MeierDepartment of Public Policy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; bmeier@unc.edu.
Adriane GelpiEdmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Matthew M KavanaghDepartment of Political Science, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lisa FormanDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Joseph J AmonHealth and Human Rights Division, Human Rights Watch, New York, NY, USA.
Harvard University · USHuman Rights Watch · USPublic Health Ontario · CAUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NIAID NIH HHS P30-AI50410PHS HHS R01A108366-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe scale of the HIV pandemic - and the stigma, discrimination and violence that surrounded its sudden emergence - catalyzed a public health response that expanded human rights in principle and practice. In the absence of effective treatment, human rights activists initially sought to protect individuals at high risk of HIV infection. With advances in antiretroviral therapy, activists expanded their efforts under international law, advocating under the human right to health for individual access to treatment. DISCUSSION: As a clinical cure comes within reach, human rights obligations will continue to play a key role in political and programmatic decision-making. Building upon the evolving development and implementation of the human right to health in the global response to HIV, we outline a human rights research agenda to prepare for HIV cure access, investigating the role of human rights law in framing 1) resource allocation, 2) international obligations, 3) intellectual property and 4) freedom from coercion.

conclusionsThe right to health is widely recognized as central to governmental, intergovernmental and non-governmental responses to the pandemic and critical both to addressing vulnerability to infection and to ensuring universal access to HIV prevention, treatment, care and support. While the advent of an HIV cure will raise new obligations for policymakers in implementing the right to health, the resolution of past debates surrounding HIV prevention and treatment may inform claims for universal access.

Indexed as

Human RightsHealth Services AccessibilityHIV InfectionsHumansIntellectual PropertyPatient Acceptance of Health Careessential medicinesglobal governanceHIV curehuman rightsoperations researchright to health

Identifiers

PMID26568056
PMCPMC4644771
OpenAlexW2175446300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.