Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26567804›Full record

Trial reportPsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2016

Role of Context, Resources, and Target Population in the Fidelity of Critical Time Intervention.

Stacey L Barrenger, Liat S Kriegel, Beth Angell, Jeffrey Draine

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial

In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

2citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

Helping women transition out of sex work: study protocol of a mixed-methods process and outcome evaluation of a sex work exiting program.BMC women's health · 2020
Article
Risk Environments of Permanent Supportive Housing for Formerly Incarcerated People with Serious Mental Illnesses: A Protocol for a Novel Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.International journal of qualitative methods
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stacey L BarrengerDr. Barrenger is with the Silver School of Social Work, New York University, New York City (e-mail: sb4705@nyu.edu ). Ms. Kriegel is with the School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Dr. Angell is with the School of Social Work, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey. Dr. Draine is with the School of Social Work, Temple University, Philadelphia.

Liat S KriegelDr. Barrenger is with the Silver School of Social Work, New York University, New York City (e-mail: sb4705@nyu.edu ). Ms. Kriegel is with the School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Dr. Angell is with the School of Social Work, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey. Dr. Draine is with the School of Social Work, Temple University, Philadelphia.

Beth AngellDr. Barrenger is with the Silver School of Social Work, New York University, New York City (e-mail: sb4705@nyu.edu ). Ms. Kriegel is with the School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Dr. Angell is with the School of Social Work, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey. Dr. Draine is with the School of Social Work, Temple University, Philadelphia.

Jeffrey DraineDr. Barrenger is with the Silver School of Social Work, New York University, New York City (e-mail: sb4705@nyu.edu ). Ms. Kriegel is with the School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Dr. Angell is with the School of Social Work, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey. Dr. Draine is with the School of Social Work, Temple University, Philadelphia.

Funding

Critical Time Intervention (CTI) for Men with Mental Illness Leaving PrisonR01MH076068 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GELLES, RICHARD J. · 2006 to 2010

$3.0M

NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH076068NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH076068

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe goal of this study was to understand departures from a model program, critical time intervention (CTI), when used with a population of men with mental illness who were leaving prison, a new population for the intervention.

methodsA fidelity study was conducted with the CTI Fidelity Scale Manual, and six program staff participated in semistructured interviews. Thematic analysis of interviews supplemented information on departures from the model.

resultsThe overall fidelity score indicated a well-implemented program, but low scores on early engagement, early linking with community resources, monitoring the transfer of services from CTI to community services, and nine-month follow-up were related to the context of the prison setting, the population of men leaving prison, and environmental resources.

conclusionsThe setting in which evidence-based practices are applied, the environmental resources available, and the target population may affect program fidelity.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeHealth Services Needs and DemandCase ManagementHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMental DisordersPrisonersPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID26567804

DOI10.1176/appi.ps.201400108

PMCPMC12937138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceTDM

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.