Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26567336›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2016

Covalent Label Transfer between Peroxisomal Importomer Components Reveals Export-driven Import Interactions.

Moninder S Bhogal, Thomas Lanyon-Hogg, Katherine A Johnston, Stuart L Warriner, Alison Baker

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Peroxisome protein import: a complex journey.Biochemical Society transactions · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Moninder S BhogalFrom the Centre for Plant Sciences and School of Molecular and Cellular Biology and.
Thomas Lanyon-HoggFrom the Centre for Plant Sciences and School of Molecular and Cellular Biology and School of Chemistry and Astbury Centre, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7092-8096
Katherine A JohnstonFrom the Centre for Plant Sciences and School of Molecular and Cellular Biology and.
Stuart L WarrinerSchool of Chemistry and Astbury Centre, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
Alison BakerFrom the Centre for Plant Sciences and School of Molecular and Cellular Biology and a.baker@leeds.ac.uk.
University of Leeds · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D000904/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D D000904/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peroxisomes are vital metabolic organelles found in almost all eukaryotic organisms, and they rely exclusively on import of their matrix protein content from the cytosol. In vitro import of proteins into isolated peroxisomal fractions has provided a wealth of knowledge on the import process. However, the common method of protease protection garnered no information on the import of an N-terminally truncated PEX5 (PEX5C) receptor construct or peroxisomal malate dehydrogenase 1 (pMDH1) cargo protein into sunflower peroxisomes because of high degrees of protease susceptibility or resistance, respectively. Here we present a means for analysis of in vitro import through a covalent biotin label transfer and employ this method to the import of PEX5C. Label transfer demonstrates that the PEX5C construct is monomeric under the conditions of the import assay. This technique was capable of identifying the PEX5-PEX14 interaction as the first interaction of the import process through competition experiments. Labeling of the peroxisomal protein import machinery by PEX5C demonstrated that this interaction was independent of added cargo protein, and, strikingly, the interaction between PEX5C and the import machinery was shown to be ATP-dependent. These important mechanistic insights highlight the power of label transfer in studying interactions, rather than proteins, of interest and demonstrate that this technique should be applied to future studies of peroxisomal in vitro import.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsBiotinBiotinylationCarrier ProteinsCell MembraneCytosolHelianthusMalate DehydrogenaseMembrane ProteinsPeptide HydrolasesPeroxisomesPeroxisome-Targeting Signal 1 ReceptorProtein BindingProtein Interaction MappingProtein Structure, TertiaryArabidopsis ProteinsBiotinCarrier ProteinsMalate DehydrogenaseMembrane ProteinsPeptide HydrolasesPeroxisome-Targeting Signal 1 ReceptorPEX14 protein, ArabidopsisPEX5 protein, ArabidopsisPMDH1 protein, ArabidopsisReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearRepressor ProteinsArabidopsisbiotinylationperoxisomePEX14PEX5protein chemical modificationprotein importprotein-protein interaction

Identifiers

PMID26567336
PMCPMC4732227
OpenAlexW2175155916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.