Trial reportBreast cancer research and treatment2015
Health-related quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer treated with eribulin mesylate or capecitabine in an open-label randomized phase 3 trial.
Trial report in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III Open Label, Randomized Two-Parallel-Arm Multicenter Study of E7389 Versus Capecitabine in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With Anthracyclines and Taxanes
Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Phase II Trial, on the Effect of an Oral Supplement,TK3 (Tryptophan and Thiamine) on the Quality of Life and Chemotherapy Tolerance in Cancer Patients With Advanced Disease.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Capecitabine for hormone receptor-positive versus hormone receptor-negative breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Time to deterioration in cancer randomized clinical trials for patient-reported outcomes data: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020Pooled it
- Mindfulness-based stress reduction for women diagnosed with breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Quality-of-life assessment in the randomized JBCRG-M06/EMERALD study of eribulin plus dual HER2 blockade in HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and safety of eribulin mesylate vs. docetaxel or paclitaxel, combined with trastuzumab and pertuzumab, as first-line treatment for HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: updated subgroup analyses of JBCRG-M06/EMERALD.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Trial
- Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes With Vital Sign Monitoring During Trastuzumab Deruxtecan Therapy: The PRO-DUCE Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Trastuzumab-Pertuzumab Plus Eribulin or Taxane as First-Line Chemotherapy for Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2-Positive Locally Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer: The Randomized Noninferiority Phase III EMERALD Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Trial
- Trial
- A phase Ib/II study of eribulin in combination with cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Trial
- Bi-weekly eribulin therapy for metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter phase II prospective study (JUST-STUDY).Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2018Trial
- Quality of Life in Adults With Metastatic Breast Cancer: The Impact of Between- and Within-Person Changes in Symptoms and Positive Affect.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Trends in Patient Misperception and Decisional Regret During Treatment for Advanced Cancer: An Exploratory, Single-Center Study of English-Speaking Adults.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
- Subtype-specific health and economic impact of delayed breast cancer diagnosis during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium: a Markov model analysis.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Article
- Eribulin in breast cancer: Current insights and therapeutic perspectives.World journal of experimental medicine · 2024Review
- Cost-benefit evaluation of advanced therapy lines in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in Germany.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2024Article
- Sacituzumab-govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a multicenter effectiveness and safety study.Future oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of eribulin as first-line or second-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative hormone-resistant advanced or metastatic breast cancer: findings from the multi-institutional, prospective, observational KBCRN A001: E-SPEC study.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2022Observational
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The clinical benefit of eribulin versus capecitabine was evaluated using health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data from a phase 3 randomized trial in patients with pretreated advanced/metastatic breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00337103). The study population has been described previously (Kaufman et al. in J Clin Oncol 33:594-601, 2015). Eligible patients received eribulin (1.4 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8) or capecitabine (1.25 g/m(2) orally twice daily on days 1-14) per 21-day cycles. HRQoL was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-life Questionnaire-Core 30 questions (QLQ-C30) and breast module-23 questions (QLQ-BR23), administered at baseline through 24 months, until disease progression or other antitumor treatment initiation. Minimally important difference (MID) and time to symptom worsening (TSW) were investigated. 1062 (96.4 %) Patients completed the EORTC questionnaire at baseline; overall, compliance was ≥80 %. Patients receiving capecitabine versus eribulin had significantly worse symptoms (higher scores) for nausea/vomiting (MID 8; P < 0.05) and diarrhea (MID 7; P < 0.05). Treatment with eribulin versus capecitabine, led to worse systemic therapy side-effects (dry mouth, different tastes, irritated eyes, feeling ill, hot flushes, headaches, and hair loss; MID 10; P < 0.01). Clinically meaningful worsening was observed for future perspective (MID 10; P < 0.05) with capecitabine and for systemic therapy side-effects scale (MID 10; P < 0.01) with eribulin. Patients receiving capecitabine experienced more-rapid deterioration in body image (by 2.9 months) and future perspective (by 1.4 months; P < 0.05) compared with those on eribulin; the opposite was observed for systemic side-effects where patients receiving eribulin experienced more-rapid deterioration than those receiving capecitabine (by 2 months; P < 0.05). Eribulin and capecitabine were found to have similar impact on patient functioning with no overall difference in HRQoL. Patients receiving eribulin reported worse systemic side-effects of chemotherapy but reduced gastrointestinal toxicity compared with capecitabine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.