Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26567010›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research and treatment2015

Health-related quality of life in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer treated with eribulin mesylate or capecitabine in an open-label randomized phase 3 trial.

Javier Cortes, Stacie Hudgens, Chris Twelves, Edith A Perez, Ahmad Awada, Louise Yelle, Susan McCutcheon, Peter A Kaufman, Anna Forsythe, Galina Velikova

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00337103 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III Open Label, Randomized Two-Parallel-Arm Multicenter Study of E7389 Versus Capecitabine in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With Anthracyclines and Taxanes

TypeinterventionalSponsorEisai Inc.Ran2006 to 2017Enrolled1,276ConditionsMetastatic Breast CancerArmsEribulin Mesylate, Capecitabine
NCT03341286 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Phase II Trial, on the Effect of an Oral Supplement,TK3 (Tryptophan and Thiamine) on the Quality of Life and Chemotherapy Tolerance in Cancer Patients With Advanced Disease.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFaculdade de Medicina do ABCRan2017 to 2019Enrolled140ConditionsCancer, Quality of Life, Chemotherapy Effect, TryptophanArmsTK3
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Time to deterioration in cancer randomized clinical trials for patient-reported outcomes data: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for women diagnosed with breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Javier CortesVall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
Stacie HudgensDepartment of Quantitative Science, Clinical Outcomes Solutions, 3709 North Campbell, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Chris TwelvesDepartment of Oncology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, and St James's Institute of Oncology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF, England, UK.
Edith A PerezDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Ahmad AwadaMedical Oncology Clinic, Medicine Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Louise YelleDepartment of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Susan McCutcheonFormerly of Eisai Ltd, Hatfield, England, UK.
Peter A KaufmanSection of Hematology/Oncology, Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Anna ForsytheDepartment of Global Value and Access Strategy, Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA.
Galina VelikovaDepartment of Oncology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, and St James's Institute of Oncology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF, England, UK. g.velikova@leeds.ac.uk.
Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USEisai (United Kingdom) · GBEisai (United States) · USHealth Outcomes Solutions (United States) · USInstitut Jules Bordet · BEInstituto Cajal · ESMayo Clinic in Florida · USSt James's University Hospital · GBUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Medical Research Council MR/L01629X/1NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical benefit of eribulin versus capecitabine was evaluated using health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data from a phase 3 randomized trial in patients with pretreated advanced/metastatic breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00337103). The study population has been described previously (Kaufman et al. in J Clin Oncol 33:594-601, 2015). Eligible patients received eribulin (1.4 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8) or capecitabine (1.25 g/m(2) orally twice daily on days 1-14) per 21-day cycles. HRQoL was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-life Questionnaire-Core 30 questions (QLQ-C30) and breast module-23 questions (QLQ-BR23), administered at baseline through 24 months, until disease progression or other antitumor treatment initiation. Minimally important difference (MID) and time to symptom worsening (TSW) were investigated. 1062 (96.4 %) Patients completed the EORTC questionnaire at baseline; overall, compliance was ≥80 %. Patients receiving capecitabine versus eribulin had significantly worse symptoms (higher scores) for nausea/vomiting (MID 8; P < 0.05) and diarrhea (MID 7; P < 0.05). Treatment with eribulin versus capecitabine, led to worse systemic therapy side-effects (dry mouth, different tastes, irritated eyes, feeling ill, hot flushes, headaches, and hair loss; MID 10; P < 0.01). Clinically meaningful worsening was observed for future perspective (MID 10; P < 0.05) with capecitabine and for systemic therapy side-effects scale (MID 10; P < 0.01) with eribulin. Patients receiving capecitabine experienced more-rapid deterioration in body image (by 2.9 months) and future perspective (by 1.4 months; P < 0.05) compared with those on eribulin; the opposite was observed for systemic side-effects where patients receiving eribulin experienced more-rapid deterioration than those receiving capecitabine (by 2 months; P < 0.05). Eribulin and capecitabine were found to have similar impact on patient functioning with no overall difference in HRQoL. Patients receiving eribulin reported worse systemic side-effects of chemotherapy but reduced gastrointestinal toxicity compared with capecitabine.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCapecitabineFemaleFuransHumansKetonesMiddle AgedPolyether PolyketidesAntineoplastic AgentsCapecitabineeribulinFuransKetonesPolyether PolyketidesBreast cancerEribulinMinimally important differenceQuality of lifeSide effects

Identifiers

PMID26567010
PMCPMC4661183
OpenAlexW2175453042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.