ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2016
Peptide-level Robust Ridge Regression Improves Estimation, Sensitivity, and Specificity in Data-dependent Quantitative Label-free Shotgun Proteomics.
Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differential protein expression analysis of quantitative mass spectrometry data using DEqMS.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- ProteoForge: An Imputation-Aware Framework for Differential Proteoform Discovery in Bottom-Up Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2026Article
- DiaReport: reproducible workflow for differential expression analysis and interactive reporting in DIA-based proteomics.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Article
- FKBP51 inhibition by SAFit2 modulates tau pathology and cognitive deficits in PS19 mice.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026Article
- omicsGMF: a multi-tool for dimensionality reduction, batch correction and imputation in bulk- and single-cell proteomics.Nature communications · 2026Article
- GRASPing experience-dependent protein expression signatures enriched for hippocampal engram cell synapses.Science advances · 2026Article
- JUMPlion improves quantitative DIA proteomics through ion-level recovery of missing values.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- In Vivo Chemical Reprogramming Is Associated With a Toxic Accumulation of Lipid Droplets Hindering Rejuvenation.Aging cell · 2026Article
- Maternal slow-release nitrogen diets during late gestation optimize the energy metabolism in calves' skeletal muscle.PloS one · 2026Article
- A shrinkage-based statistical method for testing group mean differences in quantitative bottom-up proteomics.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Potential of Proteomics in Forensic Phenotyping: A Focus on Biological Sex Estimation.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- Matrix stiffness drives alterations in aldehyde metabolism, inducing DNA damage and transformation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Proteomics of the temporal cortex in semantic dementia reveals brain-region specific molecular pathology and regulation of the TDP-43-ANXA11 interactome.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025Article
- A collagen IV fluorophore knock-in toolkit reveals trimer diversity in C. elegans basement membranes.The Journal of cell biology · 2025Article
- Quantitative Changes in the Proteome of Chronically Inflamed Lacrimal Glands From a Sjögren's Disease Animal Model.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- An updated Bioconductor workflow for correlation profiling subcellular proteomics.F1000Research · 2025Article
- Multi-omics characterization of the monkeypox virus infection.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Statistical Testing for Protein Equivalence Identifies Core Functional Modules Conserved across 360 Cancer Cell Lines and Presents a General Approach to Investigating Biological Systems.Journal of proteome research · 2024Article
- Multi-omics characterization of partial chemical reprogramming reveals evidence of cell rejuvenation.eLife · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peptide intensities from mass spectra are increasingly used for relative quantitation of proteins in complex samples. However, numerous issues inherent to the mass spectrometry workflow turn quantitative proteomic data analysis into a crucial challenge. We and others have shown that modeling at the peptide level outperforms classical summarization-based approaches, which typically also discard a lot of proteins at the data preprocessing step. Peptide-based linear regression models, however, still suffer from unbalanced datasets due to missing peptide intensities, outlying peptide intensities and overfitting. Here, we further improve upon peptide-based models by three modular extensions: ridge regression, improved variance estimation by borrowing information across proteins with empirical Bayes and M-estimation with Huber weights. We illustrate our method on the CPTAC spike-in study and on a study comparing wild-type and ArgP knock-out Francisella tularensis proteomes. We show that the fold change estimates of our robust approach are more precise and more accurate than those from state-of-the-art summarization-based methods and peptide-based regression models, which leads to an improved sensitivity and specificity. We also demonstrate that ionization competition effects come already into play at very low spike-in concentrations and confirm that analyses with peptide-based regression methods on peptide intensity values aggregated by charge state and modification status (e.g. MaxQuant's peptides.txt file) are slightly superior to analyses on raw peptide intensity values (e.g. MaxQuant's evidence.txt file).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.