Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26566671›Full record

ArticleHuman molecular genetics2016

CpG methylation differences between neurons and glia are highly conserved from mouse to human.

Noah J Kessler, Timothy E Van Baak, Maria S Baker, Eleonora Laritsky, Cristian Coarfa, Robert A Waterland

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human molecular genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Region-specific RNA mOpen biology · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noah J KesslerDepartment of Pediatrics.
Timothy E Van BaakDepartment of Pediatrics.
Maria S BakerDepartment of Pediatrics.
Eleonora LaritskyDepartment of Pediatrics.
Cristian CoarfaDepartment of Molecular & Cell Biology and.
Robert A WaterlandDepartment of Pediatrics, Department of Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center,Houston, TX, USA waterland@bcm.edu.
Children's Nutrition Research Center at Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Epigenomics Data Analysis and Coordination Center at Baylor College of MedicineU01DA025956 · NIDA · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI BEAUDET, ARTHUR L., MILOSAVLJEVIC, ALEKSANDAR · 2008 to 2013
$8.9M
NIDA NIH HHS U01DA025956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding epigenetic differences that distinguish neurons and glia is of fundamental importance to the nascent field of neuroepigenetics. A recent study used genome-wide bisulfite sequencing to survey differences in DNA methylation between these two cell types, in both humans and mice. That study minimized the importance of cell type-specific differences in CpG methylation, claiming these are restricted to localized genomic regions, and instead emphasized that widespread and highly conserved differences in non-CpG methylation distinguish neurons and glia. We reanalyzed the data from that study and came to markedly different conclusions. In particular, we found widespread cell type-specific differences in CpG methylation, with a genome-wide tendency for neuronal CpG-hypermethylation punctuated by regions of glia-specific hypermethylation. Alarmingly, our analysis indicated that the majority of genes identified by the primary study as exhibiting cell type-specific CpG methylation differences were misclassified. To verify the accuracy of our analysis, we isolated neuronal and glial DNA from mouse cortex and performed quantitative bisulfite pyrosequencing at nine loci. The pyrosequencing results corroborated our analysis, without exception. Most interestingly, we found that gene-associated neuron vs. glia CpG methylation differences are highly conserved across human and mouse, and are very likely to be functional. In addition to underscoring the importance of independent verification to confirm the conclusions of genome-wide epigenetic analyses, our data indicate that CpG methylation plays a major role in neuroepigenetics, and that the mouse is likely an excellent model in which to study the role of DNA methylation in human neurodevelopment and disease.

Indexed as

CpG IslandsDNA MethylationGenomeAnimalsEvolution, MolecularFemaleHumansMaleMiceMiddle AgedNeurogliaNeuronsSequence Analysis, DNASulfiteshydrogen sulfiteSulfites

Identifiers

PMID26566671
PMCPMC4706111
OpenAlexW2399249103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.