Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26566471›Full record

ArticleInjury epidemiology

Public opinion concerning residential sprinkler systems for 1- and 2-family homes.

Shannon Frattaroli, Keshia M Pollack, Phillip J Cook, Michele Salomon, Elise Omaki, Andrea C Gielen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Injury epidemiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shannon FrattaroliThe Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Injury Research and Policy, 624 North Broadway, 5th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA.
Keshia M PollackThe Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Injury Research and Policy, 624 North Broadway, 5th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA.
Phillip J CookDuke Sanford School of Public Policy, Durham, USA.
Michele SalomonHarris Poll, Inc, New York, USA.
Elise OmakiThe Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Injury Research and Policy, 624 North Broadway, 5th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA.
Andrea C GielenThe Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Injury Research and Policy, 624 North Broadway, 5th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResidential sprinkler systems (RSS) are one intervention to prevent fire injury and death, yet there is no literature documenting why RSS homeowners opt to purchase a sprinkler-equipped home. This manuscript describes homeowners' decisions to purchase homes with residential sprinkler systems (RSS) and their experiences with the technology. It also compares how RSS homeowners and owners of homes without RSS value sprinklers and their levels of support for policies to mandate RSS in new homes.

methodsWe used a national online web panel to sample owners of 1- and 2-family homes, and descriptive methods to analyze the resulting data.

resultsOur final sample included 1,357 homeowners of 1- and 2-family homes without RSS and 976 homeowners with RSS. RSS homeowners were more likely than owners of non-RSS homes to indicate they would buy an RSS home in the future (75 % vs. 30 %), and more often indicated a willingness to pay for sprinklers (70 % vs. 40 %). RSS homeowners also expressed higher levels of support for policies to mandate RSS in all new 1- and 2-family homes (48 % vs. 19 %).

conclusionsThe findings offer insight into educational and policy strategies to promote RSS in all new homes, and provide a foundation for future research in this area.

Indexed as

Fire preventionResidential fire sprinkler systemsSurvey

Identifiers

PMID26566471
PMCPMC4633437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.