Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26566160›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of animal biosciences2016

Dogs as a Model for Cancer.

Heather L Gardner, Joelle M Fenger, Cheryl A London

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of animal biosciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. OptimizedJournal of veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Blood biomarkers and breed genetics of aging in pet dogs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Heather L GardnerDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences and.
Joelle M FengerDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences and.
Cheryl A LondonDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences and.

Funding

Dissecting the role of miR-9 in normal and malignant mast cell biologyK01OD019923 · OD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FENGER, JOELLE M · 2015 to 2019
$654k
NIH HHS K01 OD019923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spontaneous cancers in client-owned dogs closely recapitulate their human counterparts with respect to clinical presentation, histological features, molecular profiles, and response and resistance to therapy, as well as the evolution of drug-resistant metastases. In several instances the incorporation of dogs with cancer into the preclinical development path of cancer therapeutics has influenced outcome by helping to establish pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics relationships, dose/regimen, expected clinical toxicities, and ultimately the potential for biologic activity. As our understanding regarding the molecular drivers of canine cancers has improved, unique opportunities have emerged to leverage this spontaneous model to better guide cancer drug development so that therapies likely to fail are eliminated earlier and therapies with true potential are optimized prior to human studies. Both pets and people benefit from this approach, as it provides dogs with access to cutting-edge cancer treatments and helps to insure that people are given treatments more likely to succeed.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornAntineoplastic AgentsDisease Models, AnimalDog DiseasesDogsHumansNeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agentscancerclinical trialscomparative oncologydogpreclinical model

Identifiers

PMID26566160
PMCPMC6314649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.