Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26566087›Full record

ReviewAnalytical chemistry2016

Ambient Mass Spectrometry Imaging Using Direct Liquid Extraction Techniques.

Julia Laskin, Ingela Lanekoff

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Molecular imaging of bacterial biofilms-a systematic review.Critical reviews in microbiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mass Spectrometry Imaging.Analytical chemistry · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Quantitative mass spectrometry imaging: therapeutics & biomolecules.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Emerging Computational Methods in Mass Spectrometry Imaging.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julia LaskinPhysical Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory , P.O. Box 999, MSIN K8-88, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Ingela LanekoffDepartment of Chemistry-BMC, Uppsala University , Box 599, 751 24 Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

Mass spectrometry imaging: Linking neurodegeneration with environmental exposureR21ES024229 · NIEHS · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI LASKIN, JULIA · 2014 to 2015
$443k
NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES024229NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES024229-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Liquid-Liquid ExtractionAnimalsHumansMass Spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID26566087
PMCPMC5767520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.