Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26566026›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2015

Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification for Laboratory Confirmation of Buruli Ulcer Disease-Towards a Point-of-Care Test.

Marcus Beissner, Richard Odame Phillips, Florian Battke, Malkin Bauer, Kossi Badziklou, Fred Stephen Sarfo, Issaka Maman, Agata Rhomberg, Ebekalisai Piten, Michael Frimpong and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Detection ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Systematic review: Global host range, case fatality and detection rates ofJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Linking theOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Rapid Extraction Method ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Marcus BeissnerDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine (DITM), University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Richard Odame PhillipsKomfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana.
Florian BattkeBattke Scientia GmbH, Taufkirchen, Germany.
Malkin BauerDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine (DITM), University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Kossi BadziklouInstitut National d'Hygiène (INH), Ministère de la Santé, Lomé, Togo.
Fred Stephen SarfoKomfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana.
Issaka MamanInstitut National d'Hygiène (INH), Ministère de la Santé, Lomé, Togo.
Agata RhombergDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine (DITM), University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Ebekalisai PitenCentre Hospitalier Régional Maritime (CHR-Maritime), Tsévié, Togo.
Michael FrimpongKumasi Centre for Collaborative Research in Tropical Medicine (KCCR), Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana.
Kristina Lydia HuberDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine (DITM), University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Dominik SymankDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine (DITM), University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Moritz JanssonDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine (DITM), University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Franz Xaver WiedemannGerman Leprosy and Tuberculosis Relief Association, Togo office (DAHW-T), Lomé, Togo.
Abiba Banla KereInstitut National d'Hygiène (INH), Ministère de la Santé, Lomé, Togo.
Karl-Heinz HerbingerDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine (DITM), University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Thomas LöscherDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine (DITM), University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Gisela BretzelDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine (DITM), University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DETogolese Ministry of Health · TGKomfo Anokye Teaching Hospital · GHKumasi Centre for Collaborative Research in Tropical Medicine · GHKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology · GHNetherlands Leprosy Relief · NL

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J01477X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the major burden of Buruli ulcer disease (BUD) occurs in remote rural areas, development of point-of-care (POC) tests is considered a research priority to bring diagnostic services closer to the patients. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), a simple, robust and cost-effective technology, has been selected as a promising POC test candidate. Three BUD-specific LAMP assays are available to date, but various technical challenges still hamper decentralized application. To overcome the requirement of cold-chains for transport and storage of reagents, the aim of this study was to establish a dry-reagent-based LAMP assay (DRB-LAMP) employing lyophilized reagents. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsFollowing the design of an IS2404 based conventional LAMP (cLAMP) assay suitable to apply lyophilized reagents, a lyophylization protocol for the DRB-LAMP format was developed. Clinical performance of cLAMP was validated through testing of 140 clinical samples from 91 suspected BUD cases by routine assays, i.e. IS2404 dry-reagent-based (DRB) PCR, conventional IS2404 PCR (cPCR), IS2404 qPCR, compared to cLAMP. Whereas qPCR rendered an additional 10% of confirmed cases and samples respectively, case confirmation and positivity rates of DRB-PCR or cPCR (64.84% and 56.43%; 100% concordant results in both assays) and cLAMP (62.64% and 52.86%) were comparable and there was no significant difference between the sensitivity of the assays (DRB PCR and cPCR, 86.76%; cLAMP, 83.82%). Likewise, sensitivity of cLAMP (95.83%) and DRB-LAMP (91.67%) were comparable as determined on a set of 24 samples tested positive in all routine assays. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Both LAMP formats constitute equivalent alternatives to conventional PCR techniques. Provided the envisaged availability of field friendly DNA extraction formats, both assays are suitable for decentralized laboratory confirmation of BUD, whereby DRB-LAMP scores with the additional advantage of not requiring cold-chains. As validation of the assays was conducted in a third-level laboratory environment, field based evaluation trials are necessary to determine the clinical performance at peripheral health care level.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care SystemsAdolescentAdultBuruli UlcerChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFreeze DryingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesSensitivity and SpecificityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26566026
PMCPMC4643924
OpenAlexW2176098675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.