Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26566010›Full record

ArticleBreastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine

Discontinuity of Breastfeeding Care: "There's No Captain of the Ship".

Christine D Garner, Stephannie L Ratcliff, Loralei L Thornburg, Elaine Wethington, Cynthia R Howard, Kathleen M Rasmussen

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Testing the buffering hypothesis: Breastfeeding problems, cessation, and social support in the UK.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2022
    Article
  13. Prenatal Provider Breastfeeding Toolkit: Results of a Pilot to Increase Women's Prenatal Breastfeeding Support, Intentions, and Outcomes.Journal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Infant feeding among women with a history of breast cancer.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christine D Garner1 Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University , Ithaca, New York.
Stephannie L Ratcliff1 Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University , Ithaca, New York.
Loralei L Thornburg2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester , Rochester, New York.
Elaine Wethington3 Department of Human Development, Cornell University , Ithaca, New York.
Cynthia R Howard4 Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester , Rochester, New York.
Kathleen M Rasmussen1 Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University , Ithaca, New York.

Funding

TRAINING IN MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITIONT32HD087137 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI Laura Bellows, Julia L. Finkelstein · 2016 to 2026
$2.0M
TRAINING IN MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITIONT32HD007331 · NICHD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI RASMUSSEN, KATHLEEN M · 1987 to 2013
$1.3M
NICHD NIH HHS 5 T32 HD007331NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD087137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreastfeeding rates in the United States are suboptimal. Health professionals (HPs) have a unique opportunity to support breastfeeding because of the frequency and timing of their visits with mothers and infants as well as their call by professional organizations to do so. The objective of this study was to understand HPs' perceived roles and experiences with providing breastfeeding-related care. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 34 HPs (obstetricians, midwives, pediatricians, nurses, and lactation consultants) who care for pregnant or lactating women. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and verified for accuracy; content analysis was used to identify themes using a grounded theory approach.

resultsThe overarching theme was discontinuity in breastfeeding care across the continuum. Most HPs relied on other HPs to provide breastfeeding care, which resulted from and contributed to problematic gaps in care that were reported. A minority of HPs attempted to bridge gaps in breastfeeding care or improve continuity. Contributing to the discontinuity were a lack of time, lack of skills, inconsistent messages, and low communication across stages of care. HPs were unsure whether their help was effective and whether required follow-up was completed.

conclusionsDespite HPs' recognition of breastfeeding as the best choice for infant feeding, breastfeeding care may be disjointed and a barrier to achieving breastfeeding recommendations. These problems should be investigated and systemically addressed in future research so that maternal-infant dyad breastfeeding care can be improved.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelBreast FeedingSocial SupportAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHealth Status DisparitiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicMothersPatient Education as TopicProfessional RoleQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID26566010
PMCPMC4742991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.