ArticleCytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry2017
Vascular Health Profile predicts cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes.
Article in Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toward a new taxonomy of obstetrical disease: improved performance of maternal blood biomarkers for the great obstetrical syndromes when classified according to placental pathology.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe previously reported the development of a novel high dimensional cytomic assay, the Vascular Health Profile (VHP) based on measurements of angiogenic circulating hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (CHSPC
methodsThe original data were generated as previously described by measuring a broad panel of progenitor cells and EVs and profiled using cytometric fingerprinting. Subjects were classified into groups according to the occurrence of adjudicated CV events including myocardial infarction, stroke, major adverse cardiovascular events, revascularization, and irregular rhythm. Cross-validated Linear Discriminate Analysis (LDA) models were constructed and used to predict the occurrence of events, and were evaluated for predictive accuracy (AUC, area under the curve) using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
resultsOver the period of this analysis, follow-up data was obtained on 87 subjects, with 32 events occurring overall, and only in the diabetic group. In all cases, the VHP added significant predictive power, in the form of ROC analysis, for all evaluated outcomes with the exception of irregular rhythm.
conclusionsThe VHP, a relatively simple blood test, can provide sensitive and clinically relevant information on the vascular status of a patient that may be useful for a variety of applications including drug development, clinical risk assessment, and companion diagnostics. © 2015 International Clinical Cytometry Society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.