Trial reportEar and hearing
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Benefits of a Multimedia Educational Program for First-Time Hearing Aid Users.
Trial report in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03136718 (The Feasibility of mHealth Technologies to Improve Hearing Aid Use and Benefit in First-time Hearing Aid Users), which is not on this map. Cited by 58 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Feasibility of mHealth Technologies to Improve Hearing Aid Use and Benefit in First-time Hearing Aid Users
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effects of multimedia education tools on patients' health knowledge.British journal of community nursing · 2026Pooled it
- Understanding engagement with digital health interventions designed for adults with hearing loss and tinnitus: a mixed-method systematic review.Translational behavioral medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Hearing aids for mild to moderate hearing loss in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Digital Interventions for First-Time Hearing Aid Users: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Effectiveness.Trends in hearingPooled it
- Internet-Based Interventions for Adults With Hearing Loss, Tinnitus, and Vestibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Trends in hearingPooled it
- Patient-Centered Hearing Intervention Leads to Positive Outcomes: The Association of Hearing Technology With Daily Hearing Aid Usage and Listening Goals in the Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders Study.American journal of audiology · 2026Trial
- Effectiveness of multimedia courses in improving self-care among patients with breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2023Trial
- Development, assessment, and monitoring of audiologic treatment fidelity in the aging and cognitive health evaluation in elders (ACHIEVE) randomised controlled trial.International journal of audiology · 2022Trial
- Effectiveness of a Web-Based SUpport PRogram (SUPR) for Hearing Aid Users Aged 50+: Two-Arm, Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- A Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trial of the I-PLAN Intervention to Promote Hearing Aid Use Among First-Time Adult Hearing Aid Users.Trends in hearingTrial
- Trial
- Article
- Digital Health Communication for Deaf Individuals: Scoping Review of Technologies, Strategies, and Outcomes.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Mood and Cognitive Disorders Following Hearing Loss: Impact of Hearing Aid Timing.Audiology research · 2026Review
- Article
- Implementation Outcomes of Reusable Learning Objects in Health Care Education Across Three Malaysian Universities: Evaluation Using the RE-AIM Framework.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Establishing Linguistic Categories for Hearing Aid Experiences in Adults: A Modified Delphi Study.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe aims of this study were to (1) develop a series of short interactive videos (or reusable learning objects [RLOs]) covering a broad range of practical and psychosocial issues relevant to the auditory rehabilitation for first-time hearing aid users; (2) establish the accessibility, take-up, acceptability and adherence of the RLOs; and (3) assess the benefits and cost-effectiveness of the RLOs.
designThe study was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial with two arms. The intervention group (RLO+, n = 103) received the RLOs plus standard clinical service including hearing aid(s) and counseling, and the waitlist control group (RLO-, n = 100) received standard clinical service only. The effectiveness of the RLOs was assessed 6-weeks posthearing aid fitting. Seven RLOs (total duration 1 hr) were developed using a participatory, community of practice approach involving hearing aid users and audiologists. RLOs included video clips, illustrations, animations, photos, sounds and testimonials, and all were subtitled. RLOs were delivered through DVD for TV (50.6%) and PC (15.2%), or via the internet (32.9%).
resultsRLO take-up was 78%. Adherence overall was at least 67%, and 97% in those who attended the 6-week follow-up. Half the participants watched the RLOs two or more times, suggesting self-management of their hearing loss, hearing aids, and communication. The RLOs were rated as highly useful and the majority of participants agreed the RLOs were enjoyable, improved their confidence and were preferable to written information. Postfitting, there was no significant between-group difference in the primary outcome measure, overall hearing aid use. However, there was significantly greater hearing aid use in the RLO+ group for suboptimal users. Furthermore, the RLO+ group had significantly better knowledge of practical and psychosocial issues, and significantly better practical hearing aid skills than the RLO- group.
conclusionsThe RLOs were shown to be beneficial to first-time hearing aid users across a range of quantitative and qualitative measures. This study provides evidence to suggest that the RLOs may provide valuable learning and educational support for first-time hearing aid users and could be used to supplement clinical rehabilitation practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.