Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26565746›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2015

Specific Binding of Tetratricopeptide Repeat Proteins to Heat Shock Protein 70 (Hsp70) and Heat Shock Protein 90 (Hsp90) Is Regulated by Affinity and Phosphorylation.

Victoria A Assimon, Daniel R Southworth, Jason E Gestwicki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mechanisms and regulation of the Hsp70 chaperone network.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. DnaJC7 specifically regulates tau seeding.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Victoria A AssimonProgram in Chemical Biology, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.
Daniel R SouthworthProgram in Chemical Biology, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.
Jason E GestwickiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California at San Francisco , San Francisco, California 94158, United States.

Funding

Molecular Chaperones and Small MoleculesR01NS059690 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Jason E Gestwicki · 2008 to 2026
$7.9M
Exploration of Molecular Chaperone Complexes During Active Protein TriageR01GM109896 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ANDREWS, PHILIP C, GESTWICKI, JASON E · 2014 to 2017
$1.1M
Understanding the Logic of Protein Triage DecisionsF31AG043266 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ASSIMON, VICTORIA ANNE · 2013 to 2015
$63k
NIA NIH HHS F31 AG043266NIA NIH HHS F31 AG043266-02NIGMS NIH HHS GM109896NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109896NINDS NIH HHS NS059690NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS059690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) and heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) require the help of tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain-containing cochaperones for many of their functions. Each monomer of Hsp70 or Hsp90 can interact with only a single TPR cochaperone at a time, and each member of the TPR cochaperone family brings distinct functions to the complex. Thus, competition for TPR binding sites on Hsp70 and Hsp90 appears to shape chaperone activity. Recent structural and biophysical efforts have improved our understanding of chaperone-TPR contacts, focusing on the C-terminal EEVD motif that is present in both chaperones. To better understand these important protein-protein interactions on a wider scale, we measured the affinity of five TPR cochaperones, CHIP, Hop, DnaJC7, FKBP51, and FKBP52, for the C-termini of four members of the chaperone family, Hsc70, Hsp72, Hsp90α, and Hsp90β, in vitro. These studies identified some surprising selectivity among the chaperone-TPR pairs, including the selective binding of FKBP51/52 to Hsp90α/β. These results also revealed that other TPR cochaperones are only able to weakly discriminate between the chaperones or between their paralogs. We also explored whether mimicking phosphorylation of serine and threonine residues near the EEVD motif might impact affinity and found that pseudophosphorylation had selective effects on binding to CHIP but not other cochaperones. Together, these findings suggest that both intrinsic affinity and post-translational modifications tune the interactions between the Hsp70 and Hsp90 proteins and the TPR cochaperones.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction MapsAmino Acid MotifsAmino Acid SequenceHomeodomain ProteinsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansModels, MolecularPhosphorylationProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsTacrolimus Binding Protein 5Tacrolimus Binding ProteinsTumor Suppressor ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesHomeodomain ProteinsHOPX protein, humanHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsSTUB1 protein, humantacrolimus binding protein 4Tacrolimus Binding Protein 5Tacrolimus Binding ProteinsTumor Suppressor ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID26565746
PMCPMC4714923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.