Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26564438›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2016

Contrast Leakage Patterns from Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion MRI in the Grading of Primary Pediatric Brain Tumors.

C Y Ho, J S Cardinal, A P Kamer, C Lin, S F Kralik

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sinusoidal COFrontiers in physiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Advanced MR imaging in hemispheric low-grade gliomas before surgery; the indications and limits in the pediatric age.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2016
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C Y HoFrom the Department of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. cyho@iupui.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2358-1851
J S CardinalFrom the Department of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6293-2036
A P KamerFrom the Department of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0898-7623
C LinFrom the Department of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6146-7347
S F KralikFrom the Department of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7213-1761
Indiana University School of MedicineIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe pattern of contrast leakage from DSC tissue signal intensity time curves have shown utility in distinguishing adult brain neoplasms, but has limited description in the literature for pediatric brain tumors. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of grading pediatric brain tumors with this technique. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective review of tissue signal-intensity time curves from 63 pediatric brain tumors with preoperative DSC perfusion MR imaging was performed independently by 2 neuroradiologists. Tissue signal-intensity time curves were generated from ROIs placed in the highest perceived tumor relative CBV. The postbolus portion of the curve was independently classified as returning to baseline, continuing above baseline (T1-dominant contrast leakage), or failing to return to baseline (T2*-dominant contrast leakage). Interobserver agreement of curve classification was evaluated by using the Cohen κ. A consensus classification of curve type was obtained in discrepant cases, and the consensus classification was compared with tumor histology and World Health Organization grade.

resultsTissue signal-intensity time curve classification concordance was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.54-0.84) overall and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.59-0.91) for a T1-dominant contrast leakage pattern. Twenty-five of 25 tumors with consensus T1-dominant contrast leakage were low-grade (positive predictive value, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.83-1.00). By comparison, tumors with consensus T2*-dominant contrast leakage or return to baseline were predominantly high-grade (10/15 and 15/23, respectively) with a high negative predictive value (1.0; 95% CI, 0.83-1.0). For pilomyxoid or pilocytic astrocytomas, a T1-dominant leak demonstrated high sensitivity (0.91; 95% CI, 0.70-0.98) and specificity (0.90, 95% CI, 0.75-0.97).

conclusionsThere was good interobserver agreement in the classification of DSC perfusion tissue signal-intensity time curves for pediatric brain tumors, particularly for T1-dominant leakage. Among patients with pediatric brain tumors, a T1-dominant leakage pattern is highly specific for a low-grade tumor and demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity for pilocytic or pilomyxoid astrocytomas.

Indexed as

AdultAstrocytomaBrain NeoplasmsChildContrast MediaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeoplasm GradingRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID26564438
PMCPMC7960142
OpenAlexW2173132951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.