Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26564228›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2016

Using self-reports of pain and other variables to distinguish between older women with back pain due to vertebral fractures and those with back pain due to degenerative changes.

E M Clark, R Gooberman-Hill, T J Peters

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Osteoporosis in 2022: Care gaps to screening and personalised medicine.Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. State of the art in osteoporosis risk assessment and treatment.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Impact of mild and moderate/severe vertebral fractures on physical activity: a prospective study of older women in the UK.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Article
  18. A modification and validation of quantitative morphometry classification system for osteoporotic vertebral compressive fractures in mainland Chinese.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E M ClarkMusculoskeletal Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, Southmead Hospital, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK. Emma.Clark@bristol.ac.uk.
R Gooberman-HillMusculoskeletal Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, Southmead Hospital, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
T J PetersMusculoskeletal Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, Southmead Hospital, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
University of Bristol · GBSouthmead Hospital · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT ISSF 097822/Z/11/ZR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledWomen with back pain and vertebral fractures describe different pain experiences than women without vertebral fractures, particularly a shorter duration of back pain, crushing pain and pain that improves on lying down. This suggests a questionnaire could be developed to identify older women who may have osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

introductionApproximately 12 % of postmenopausal women have vertebral fractures (VFs), but less than a third come to clinical attention. Distinguishing back pain likely to relate to VF from other types of back pain may ensure appropriate diagnostic radiographs, leading to treatment initiation. This study investigated whether characteristics of back pain in women with VF are different from those in women with no VFs.

methodsA case control study was undertaken with women aged ≥60 years who had undergone thoracic spinal radiograph in the previous 3 months. Cases were defined as those with VFs identified using the algorithm-based qualitative (ABQ) method. Six hundred eighty-three potential participants were approached. Data were collected by self-completed questionnaire including the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Chi-squared tests assessed univariable associations; logistic regression identified independent predictors of VFs. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the ability of the combined independent predictors to differentiate between women with and without VFs via area under the curve (AUC) statistics.

resultsOne hundred ninety-seven women participated: 64 cases and 133 controls. Radiographs of controls were more likely to show moderate/severe degenerative change than cases (54.1 vs 29.7 %, P = 0.011). Independent predictors of VF were older age, history of previous fracture, shorter duration of back pain, pain described as crushing, pain improving on lying down and pain not spreading down the legs. AUC for combination of these factors was 0.85 (95 % CI 0.79 to 0.92).

conclusionWe present the first evidence that back pain experienced by women with osteoporotic VF is different to back pain related solely to degenerative change.

Indexed as

AgedBack PainCase-Control StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansIntervertebral Disc DegenerationMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalOsteoporotic FracturesPain MeasurementRadiographyRisk FactorsSelf ReportSocial ClassSpinal FracturesBack painCase control studyOsteoporotic vertebral fractureSelf-reported pain descriptors

Identifiers

PMID26564228
PMCPMC4791465
OpenAlexW2118738171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.