Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26564221›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2016

Age at hysterectomy as a predictor for subsequent pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Rune Lykke, Jan Blaakær, Bent Ottesen, Helga Gimbel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rune LykkeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. runelykk@rm.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7756-8575
Jan BlaakærDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Bent OttesenJuliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Helga GimbelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nykøbing Falster Hospital, Nykøbing Falster, Denmark.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DKSjællands Universitetshospital, Nykøbing F. · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe aim of this study was to investigate the association between patient age at the time of hysterectomy and subsequent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery.

methodsWe gathered data on all benign hysterectomies and POP surgeries performed in Denmark on Danish women from 1977 to 2009 from the Danish National Patient Registry. The cohort consisted of 154,882 hysterectomized women, who were followed up for up to 32 years. Survival analysis for each age group at hysterectomy was performed using Kaplan-Meier product limit methods.

resultsFor all hysterectomized women, we found that low age at hysterectomy yielded a lower risk of subsequent POP surgery than did hysterectomy at an older age. This difference diminished after stratification by indication; all non-POP hysterectomies had a low cumulative incidence at 8-11 % at the end of the follow-up period. For all women hysterectomized, the predominant compartment for POP surgery was the posterior. Women hysterectomized when aged over 66 years had a higher proportion of POP surgery in the apical compartment than in the other age groups (p = 0.000).

conclusionOur findings indicate that age at hysterectomy only marginally influences the risk of subsequent POP surgery for women hysterectomized for indications other than POP. If POP is the indication for hysterectomy, the risk of undergoing subsequent POP surgery increases substantially.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsDenmarkFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHysterectomyIncidenceKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedPelvic Organ ProlapseRegistriesRisk FactorsHysterectomyKaplan–MeierPelvic organ prolapseUrogynecology

Identifiers

PMID26564221
OpenAlexW2178200394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.