ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2017
[Troponin elevation in ischemic stroke patients].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hypertension as One of the Main Non-Myocardial Infarction-Related Causes of Increased Cardiospecific Troponins: From Mechanisms to Significance in Current Medical Practice.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2022Review
- Cardiac Troponins as Biomarkers of Cardiac Myocytes Damage in Case of Arterial Hypertension: From Pathological Mechanisms to Predictive Significance.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases are major causes of death and disability worldwide. Ischemic stroke is a frequent complication in cardiac diseases and, vice versa, cardiac complications commonly cause early clinical worsening and death after stroke. In the emergency setting, cardiac biomarkers (preferably troponin, cTn) are measured frequently in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke. The measurement of cTn is recommended by the guidelines for early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke from the American Heart Association. In case of pathologic cTn elevation, physicians are confronted with diagnostic and therapeutic uncertainties. Up-to-date recommendations on interpretation and consecutive actions remain ambiguous because cTn elevations may originate from causes other than acute coronary disease and because clinical signs and symptoms of acute coronary disease may be obscured by neurological deficits of the stroke. The application of modern, high-sensitive cTn assays that detect even minor cTn elevations has rather aggravated the dilemma of how to interpret this finding in patients with ischemic stroke.This article gives an overview on possible mechanisms of the frequently observed cTn elevation in ischemic stroke patients and offers help on interpretation and meaningful actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.