Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26564160›Full record

ArticleGenetics2016

Genomic Analyses of Sperm Fate Regulator Targets Reveal a Common Set of Oogenic mRNAs in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Daniel C Noble, Scott T Aoki, Marco A Ortiz, Kyung Won Kim, Jamie M Verheyden, Judith Kimble

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. AbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Analysis of the C. elegans Germline Stem Cell Pool.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  8. The role of RNA-binding proteins in orchestrating germline development inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  9. Sex Determination in Nematode Germ Cells.Sexual development : genetics, molecular biology, evolution, endocrinology, embryology, and pathology of sex determination and differentiation · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. TheG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel C NobleDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706.
Scott T AokiDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706.
Marco A OrtizDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706.
Kyung Won KimDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706.
Jamie M VerheydenDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706.
Judith KimbleDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 jekimble@wisc.edu.

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aric L Daul, Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
Regulation of germline proliferation and differentiationR01GM069454 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KIMBLE, JUDITH · 2004 to 2012
$1.8M
The mechanics and dynamics of RNP granulesK99HD081208 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AOKI, SCOTT T · 2015 to 2016
$202k
C. elegans RNA regulatory protein complexes that control germ cell fateF32HD071692 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AOKI, SCOTT T · 2012 to 2014
$176k
Chemical control of protein stability to analyze germline cell fateF32GM095036 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI VERHEYDEN, JAMIE M · 2010 to 2012
$97k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNICHD NIH HHS F32 HD071692NICHD NIH HHS F32HD071692NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD081208NICHD NIH HHS K99HD081208NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM095036NIGMS NIH HHS F32GM095036NIGMS NIH HHS GM069454NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069454NIH HHS P40 OD010440NIH HHS P40OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Germ cell specification as sperm or oocyte is an ancient cell fate decision, but its molecular regulation is poorly understood. In Caenorhabditis elegans, the FOG-1 and FOG-3 proteins behave genetically as terminal regulators of sperm fate specification. Both are homologous to well-established RNA regulators, suggesting that FOG-1 and FOG-3 specify the sperm fate post-transcriptionally. We predicted that FOG-1 and FOG-3, as terminal regulators of the sperm fate, might regulate a battery of gamete-specific differentiation genes. Here we test that prediction by exploring on a genomic scale the messenger RNAs (mRNAs) associated with FOG-1 and FOG-3. Immunoprecipitation of the proteins and their associated mRNAs from spermatogenic germlines identifies 81 FOG-1 and 722 FOG-3 putative targets. Importantly, almost all FOG-1 targets are also FOG-3 targets, and these common targets are strongly biased for oogenic mRNAs. The discovery of common target mRNAs suggested that FOG-1 and FOG-3 work together. Consistent with that idea, we find that FOG-1 and FOG-3 proteins co-immunoprecipitate from both intact nematodes and mammalian tissue culture cells and that they colocalize in germ cells. Taking our results together, we propose a model in which FOG-1 and FOG-3 work in a complex to repress oogenic transcripts and thereby promote the sperm fate.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsFemaleMaleOogenesisRNA, MessengerRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalSpermatogenesisTransgenesCaenorhabditis elegans Proteinsfog-1 protein, C elegansFOG-3 protein, C elegansRNA, MessengerCPEBFOG-1FOG-3sperm/oocyte decisionTob

Identifiers

PMID26564160
PMCPMC4701086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.