Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26564159›Full record

ArticleGenetics2016

Synergistic Pleiotropy Overrides the Costs of Complexity in Viral Adaptation.

Lindsey W McGee, Andrew M Sackman, Anneliese J Morrison, Jessica Pierce, Jeremy Anisman, Darin R Rokyta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Interaction between mutation type and gene pleiotropy drives parallel evolution in the laboratory.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Convergent genetic adaptation ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Soil viral diversity, ecology and climate change.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The cost of evolved constitutiveEcology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The evolution of competitive ability for essential resources.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  20. A model for the interplay between plastic tradeoffs and evolution in changing environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lindsey W McGeeDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306.
Andrew M SackmanDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306.
Anneliese J MorrisonDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306.
Jessica PierceDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306.
Jeremy AnismanDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306.
Darin R RokytaDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306 drokyta@bio.fsu.edu.

Funding

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND BIOPHYSICST32GM007759 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI NOLEN, BRADLEY J · 1985 to 2021
$8.5M
Pleiotropy, Epistasis, and the Biophysical Adaptation of ssDNA BacteriophagesR01GM099723 · NIGMS · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ROKYTA, DARIN R · 2012 to 2016
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099723NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptive evolution progresses as a series of steps toward a multidimensional phenotypic optimum, and organismal or environmental complexity determines the number of phenotypic dimensions, or traits, under selection. Populations evolving in complex environments may experience costs of complexity such that improvement in one or more traits is impeded by selection on others. We compared the fitness effects of the first fixed mutations for populations of single-stranded DNA bacteriophage evolving under simple selection for growth rate to those of populations evolving under more complex selection for growth rate as well as capsid stability. We detected a cost of complexity manifested as a smaller growth rate improvement for mutations fixed under complex conditions. We found that, despite imposing a cost for growth rate improvement, strong complex selection resulted in the greatest overall fitness improvement, even for single mutations. Under weaker secondary selective pressures, tradeoffs between growth rate and stability were pervasive, but strong selection on the secondary trait resulted largely in mutations beneficial to both traits. Strength of selection therefore determined the nature of pleiotropy governing observed trait evolution, and strong positive selection forced populations to find mutations that improved multiple traits, thereby overriding costs incurred as a result of a more complex selective environment. The costs of complexity, however, remained substantial when considering the effects on a single trait in the context of selection on multiple traits.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalBiological EvolutionGenetic PleiotropyDirected Molecular EvolutionMutationMyoviridaebacteriophagecomplexitypleiotropystrong selection

Identifiers

PMID26564159
PMCPMC4701092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.