Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26563459›Full record

ArticleThyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association2016

Bethesda Categorization of Thyroid Nodule Cytology and Prediction of Thyroid Cancer Type and Prognosis.

Xiaoyun Liu, Marco Medici, Norra Kwong, Trevor E Angell, Ellen Marqusee, Matthew I Kim, P Reed Larsen, Nancy L Cho, Matthew A Nehs, Daniel T Ruan and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Indolent Behavior of Malignant Bethesda III Nodules Compared to Bethesda V/VI Nodules.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Thyroid Nodule Shape Independently Predicts Risk of Malignancy.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Xiaoyun Liu1 Thyroid Unit, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Marco Medici3 Rotterdam Thyroid Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center , Rotterdam, the Netherlands .
Norra Kwong1 Thyroid Unit, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Trevor E Angell1 Thyroid Unit, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Ellen Marqusee1 Thyroid Unit, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Matthew I Kim1 Thyroid Unit, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
P Reed Larsen1 Thyroid Unit, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Nancy L Cho4 Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Matthew A Nehs4 Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Daniel T Ruan4 Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Atul Gawande4 Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Francis Moore4 Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Justine Barletta5 Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Jeffrey F Krane5 Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Edmund S Cibas5 Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Tao Yang2 Department of Endocrinology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University , Nanjing, China .
Erik K Alexander1 Thyroid Unit, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

TRAINING GRANT IN ACADEMIC ENDOCRINOLOGYT32DK007529 · NIDDK · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Ursula B. Kaiser, Anand Vaidya · 1986 to 2026
$6.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince its inception, the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBS) has been widely adopted. Each category conveys a risk of malignancy and recommended next steps, though it is unclear if each category also predicts the type and extent of malignancy. If so, this would greatly expand the utility of the TBS by providing prognostic information in addition to baseline cancer risk.

methodsAll patients prospectively enrolled into the authors' thyroid nodule database from 1995 to 2013 with histologically proven malignancy were analyzed. The primary ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (AUS, atypia of unknown significance; FN, follicular neoplasm; SUSP, suspicious; M, malignant) was correlated with the type of thyroid cancer and histological features known to impact prognosis and recurrence, including lymph node metastasis (LNM), lymphovascular invasion, and extrathyroidal extension (ETE). Primary cytology was separately correlated with higher risk malignancy.

resultsA total of 1291 malignancies were identified, with primary cytology AUS in 130 cases, FN in 241 cases, SUSP in 411 cases, and M in 509 cases. AUS, SUSP, and M cytology were progressively associated with an increasing risk of high-risk disease (p < 0.001), LNM (p < 0.001), ETE (p < 0.001), and margin positivity (p < 0.001). Notably, 71% of malignancies with AUS cytology were follicular variants of papillary thyroid cancer compared with 63% with SUSP cytology and only 20% with M cytology. In contrast, high-risk malignancies were diagnosed in only 4% with AUS cytology, but 9% and 27% with SUSP and M cytology, respectively. FN conveyed a significantly increased risk of follicular thyroid carcinoma compared with all other types (28% vs. 2%; p < 0.001). A composite endpoint of recurrence, distant metastases, and death similarly increased as cytology progressed from AUS to SUSP to M (p < 0.001).

conclusionIn addition to predicting cancer prevalence, the TBS also imparts important prognostic information about cancer type, variant, and risk of recurrence. These data extend the utility of TBS classification by fostering an improved understanding of the risk posed by any confirmed malignancy.

Indexed as

AdultBiopsy, Fine-NeedleCarcinomaCarcinoma, PapillaryCytodiagnosisDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID26563459
PMCPMC4754507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.