Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26563418›Full record

ArticleNature communications2015

Compensating for population sampling in simulations of epidemic spread on temporal contact networks.

Mathieu Génois, Christian L Vestergaard, Ciro Cattuto, Alain Barrat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Compression-based inference of network motif sets.PLoS computational biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Predicting network dynamics without requiring the knowledge of the interaction graph.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Internet of Things Based Contact Tracing Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Predictability of real temporal networks.National science review · 2020
    Article
  15. Measuring social networks in primates: wearable sensors versus direct observations.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mathieu GénoisAix Marseille Université, Université de Toulon, CNRS, CPT, UMR 7332, 13288 Marseille, France.
Christian L VestergaardAix Marseille Université, Université de Toulon, CNRS, CPT, UMR 7332, 13288 Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5329-475X
Ciro CattutoData Science Laboratory, ISI Foundation, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Alain BarratAix Marseille Université, Université de Toulon, CNRS, CPT, UMR 7332, 13288 Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data describing human interactions often suffer from incomplete sampling of the underlying population. As a consequence, the study of contagion processes using data-driven models can lead to a severe underestimation of the epidemic risk. Here we present a systematic method to alleviate this issue and obtain a better estimation of the risk in the context of epidemic models informed by high-resolution time-resolved contact data. We consider several such data sets collected in various contexts and perform controlled resampling experiments. We show how the statistical information contained in the resampled data can be used to build a series of surrogate versions of the unknown contacts. We simulate epidemic processes on the resulting reconstructed data sets and show that it is possible to obtain good estimates of the outcome of simulations performed using the complete data set. We discuss limitations and potential improvements of our method.

Indexed as

Contact TracingAlgorithmsCommunicable DiseasesHumansModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID26563418
PMCPMC4660211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.