Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26563330›Full record

ArticleLung2016

Time, Dose, and Volume Responses in a Mouse Pulmonary Injury Model Following Ablative Irradiation.

Zhen-Yu Hong, Chang Geol Lee, Hyo Sup Shim, Eun Jung Lee, Kwang Hyun Song, Byoung Wook Choi, Jaeho Cho, Michael D Story

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lung, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Using Integrin αInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Diagnostic Value ofFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. LXACell death & disease · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Zhen-Yu HongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.
Chang Geol LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.
Hyo Sup ShimDepartment of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Eun Jung LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea.
Kwang Hyun SongDivision of Molecular Radiation Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 2201 Inwood Rd, Dallas, TX, 75093, USA.
Byoung Wook ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jaeho ChoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, South Korea. jjhmd@yuhs.ac.
Michael D StoryDivision of Molecular Radiation Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 2201 Inwood Rd, Dallas, TX, 75093, USA. Michael.Story@UTSouthwestern.edu.
Yonsei University · KRThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to determine the time, dose, and volume responses in a mouse pulmonary injury model following ablative dose focal irradiation (ADFIR) in order to better understand normal lung injury. METHODS AND MATERIALS: ADFIR was administered to the left lung of mice using a small animal micro-irradiator. Histopathological evaluation and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analyses were performed at 1, 2, 6, and 12 weeks after irradiation. Dose responses were tested at doses of 0-90 Gy in C57BL/6 and C3H/HeJCr mice at 6 weeks after irradiation. The volume effect was evaluated with 1-, 3-, and 5-mm diameter collimators at 1-4 weeks after 90-Gy irradiation.

resultsADFIR caused gross local lung injury of the inflated lung in just 1 week, with extensive hyaline material visible in the irradiated area. The fibrosing process was initiated as early as 2 weeks after irradiation. C3H and C57 mice did not show significant differences in dose response. Six weeks after irradiation, the radiation dose-response curve had a sigmoidal shape, where the lag, log, and stationary phases occurred at <40, 50-70, and >80 Gy, respectively. ADFIR induced substantial volume-dependent structural and functional damage to the lungs, and the volume changes of lung consolidation on micro-CT correlated inversely with lung fibrosis over time.

conclusionsWe determined the time, dose, and volume responses in our established small animal model, and found that lung injury was substantially accelerated and phenotypically different from that of prior studies using non-ablative hemi-thorax and complete thorax irradiation schemes.

Indexed as

Acute Lung InjuryAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleFibrosisLungMiceMice, Inbred C3HMice, Inbred C57BLOrgan SizeRadiation DosageRadiation Injuries, ExperimentalRadiosurgeryTime FactorsX-Ray MicrotomographyFibrosisSABRSmall animal model

Identifiers

PMID26563330
OpenAlexW2278371951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.