ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2016
Prediction of Protein-Protein Interaction Sites with Machine-Learning-Based Data-Cleaning and Post-Filtering Procedures.
Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comprehensive review of protein-centric predictors for biomolecular interactions: from proteins to nucleic acids and beyond.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Article
- Application of Machine Learning in Material Synthesis and Property Prediction.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Machine-learning techniques for the prediction of protein-protein interactions.Journal of biosciences · 2019Article
- SCRIBER: accurate and partner type-specific prediction of protein-binding residues from proteins sequences.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Protein-protein interaction sites prediction by ensemble random forests with synthetic minority oversampling technique.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- iNuc-ext-PseTNC: an efficient ensemble model for identification of nucleosome positioning by extending the concept of Chou's PseAAC to pseudo-tri-nucleotide composition.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2019Article
- Review
- Imbalance learning for the prediction of NBMC genomics · 2018Article
- MultiP-Apo: A Multilabel Predictor for Identifying Subcellular Locations of Apoptosis Proteins.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately predicting protein-protein interaction sites (PPIs) is currently a hot topic because it has been demonstrated to be very useful for understanding disease mechanisms and designing drugs. Machine-learning-based computational approaches have been broadly utilized and demonstrated to be useful for PPI prediction. However, directly applying traditional machine learning algorithms, which often assume that samples in different classes are balanced, often leads to poor performance because of the severe class imbalance that exists in the PPI prediction problem. In this study, we propose a novel method for improving PPI prediction performance by relieving the severity of class imbalance using a data-cleaning procedure and reducing predicted false positives with a post-filtering procedure: First, a machine-learning-based data-cleaning procedure is applied to remove those marginal targets, which may potentially have a negative effect on training a model with a clear classification boundary, from the majority samples to relieve the severity of class imbalance in the original training dataset; then, a prediction model is trained on the cleaned dataset; finally, an effective post-filtering procedure is further used to reduce potential false positive predictions. Stringent cross-validation and independent validation tests on benchmark datasets demonstrated the efficacy of the proposed method, which exhibits highly competitive performance compared with existing state-of-the-art sequence-based PPIs predictors and should supplement existing PPI prediction methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.