Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26563217›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgery2016

Suture Versus Mesh Repair in Primary and Incisional Ventral Hernias: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Tim Mathes, Maren Walgenbach, Robert Siegel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06197854 (Onlay Versus Sublay Hernioplasty in Management of Incisional Hernia), which is not on this map. Cited by 53 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06197854 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Onlay Versus Sublay Hernioplasty in Management of Incisional Hernia

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsIncisional HerniaArmsHernioplasty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Mesh fixation techniques in primary ventral or incisional hernia repair.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. A systematic review on surgical treatment of primary epigastric hernias.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2019
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Early outcomes of umbilical hernia repair with mesh suture.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tim MathesFaculty of Health-School of Medicine, Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, Building 33, 51109, Cologne, Germany. tim.mathes@uni-wh.de.
Maren WalgenbachFaculty of Health-School of Medicine, Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, Building 33, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
Robert SiegelDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch and Faculty of Health-Witten/Herdecke University, HELIOS Klinikum, Schwanebecker Chaussee 50, 13125, Berlin, Germany.
Witten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundToday, ventral hernia repair is predominantly performed with meshes. There is no meta-analysis of high quality evidence that compares the results of suture to mesh repair. The objective of this systematic review with meta-analysis is to compare patient centred outcomes of suture versus mesh repair.

methodsA systematic literature search was performed in EMBASE, MEDLINE and CENTRAL (inception to 06/2014). Furthermore a hand search was performed. RCTs comparing suture versus mesh repair in primary and incisional ventral hernia repair were included. Data on patient characteristics, interventions and results were extracted in standardized tables. Risk of bias was assessed with the cochrane risk of bias tool. Results of studies were pooled with a meta-analysis. All steps were performed by two reviewers. Discrepancies were discussed until a consensus.

resultsThe search in the databases resulted in 1560 hits. After screening, 10 randomized controlled trials including 1215 patients satisfied all inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was moderate to high. The relative risk for recurrence was 0.36 [95% CI (0.27, 0.49); I (2) = 0; heterogeneity p = 0.70]. Other complications did not differ significantly. Results for chronic pain were heterogeneous across studies.

conclusionMesh repair reduces the number of recurrences significantly. In patients without recurrence mesh repairs seem to be associated with a risk of chronic pain especially if the mesh is fixed sublay.

Indexed as

Surgical MeshSuturesChronic PainHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyHumansIncisional HerniaPatient Outcome AssessmentPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PainRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID26563217
OpenAlexW2247945409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.